Paper · 2022 · Journal of Applied Ecology

Strip intercropping of wheat and oilseed rape enhances biodiversity and biological pest control in a conventionally managed farm scenario

Viviana Alarcón‐Segura; Ingo Grass; Gunnar Breustedt; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract Conventional agriculture in the global north is typically characterized by large monocultures, commonly managed with high levels of pesticide or fertilizer input and mechanization. Strip intercropping, that is, diversifying cropland by growing strips of different crops using conventional machinery, may be a viable strategy to promote natural predator diversity and associated biological pest control in such conventional farming systems. We tested the influence of strip intercropping of conventionally managed winter wheat with oilseed rape, using common machinery with 27–36 m broad strips, on arthropod predator diversity and biological pest control. We characterized spider and carabid beetle communities, calculated pest aphid and pollen beetle densities and recorded parasitism rates for both crops (number of mummified aphids on wheat and number of parasitized pollen beetle larvae on oilseed rape). We observed a significant reduction in the densities of wheat aphids (50% decrease) and pollen beetle larvae (20% decrease) in strip intercropping areas compared to monocultures. Parasitism rates of wheat aphids increased significantly from 10% in monocultures to 25% in strip intercropping areas. The number of parasitized pollen beetle larvae did not show the same pattern but was higher towards the centre of the oilseed rape strip. Overall, the composition of predator communities benefited from the close neighbourhood of the two crop species in the strips, as carabid beetles were more abundant in oilseed rape and spiders were more abundant in wheat fields. Overall, strip intercropping reduced the dominance of one predator group and allowed for an equal representation of both spiders and carabid beetles in the mixture. Synthesis and applications . Our study presents evidence of the benefits of adopting strip intercropping with relatively large strips (adapted to existing machinery) for natural predator diversity and biological pest control in a large‐scale conventionally managed farm scenario. Wheat–oilseed rape strip intercropping reduced pest densities, increased parasitism of wheat aphids and promoted equal representation of natural predator groups well beyond the areas of monoculture. Overall, by reducing the area dedicated to only one crop, the implementation of strip intercropping adapted to mechanized agricultural scenarios can be used to increase crop heterogeneity at regional scales and enhance biodiversity and biological control, even in simplified landscapes dominated by large‐scale conventional agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip intercropping reduced wheat aphid density by 50% relative to monoculture.

Treatment
strip intercroppinge0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
densities of wheat aphidse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a significant reduction in the densities of wheat aphids (50% decrease) and pollen beetle larvae (20% decrease) in strip intercropping areas compared to monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip intercropping reduced pollen beetle larval density by 20%.

Taxon
wheat and oilseed rapeBrassica napusTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
strip intercroppinge0
Interactor
pollen beetlee0pest
Outcome
pollen beetle larvaee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a significant reduction in the densities of wheat aphids (50% decrease) and pollen beetle larvae (20% decrease) in strip intercropping areas compared to monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat aphid parasitism rose from 10% in monoculture to 25% in strips.

Treatment
strip intercropping arease0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
Parasitism rates of wheat aphidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
10%e0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parasitism rates of wheat aphids increased significantly from 10% in monocultures to 25% in strip intercropping areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1215 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitized pollen beetle larvae were more numerous toward the rape strip centre.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Interactor
pollen beetlee0pest
Outcome
number of parasitized pollen beetle larvaee0
Direction
highere0
Setting
centre of the oilseed rape stripe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of parasitized pollen beetle larvae did not show the same pattern but was higher towards the centre of the oilseed rape strip.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carabid beetles were more abundant in oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Interactor
carabid beetlese0other
Outcome
carabid beetlese0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carabid beetles were more abundant in oilseed rape and spiders were more abundant in wheat fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiders were more abundant in wheat fields.

Interactor
spidersAraneaee0other
Outcome
spiderse0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carabid beetles were more abundant in oilseed rape and spiders were more abundant in wheat fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip intercropping reduced dominance by one predator group and equalized spider and carabid representation.

Taxon
wheat and oilseed rapeBrassica napusTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
strip intercroppinge0
Interactor
spidersAraneaee0other
Second interactor
carabid beetlese0other
Outcome
equal representation of both spiders and carabid beetlese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strip intercropping reduced the dominance of one predator group and allowed for an equal representation of both spiders and carabid beetles in the mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1747 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–45 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

intercropping · Aphidomorpha · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.