Paper · 2022 · Remote Sensing

Winter Wheat Yield Estimation Based on Optimal Weighted Vegetation Index and BHT-ARIMA Model

Qiuzhuo Deng; Mengxuan Wu; Haiyang Zhang; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aims to use remote sensing (RS) time-series data to explore the intrinsic relationship between crop growth and yield formation at different fertility stages and construct a high-precision winter wheat yield estimation model applicable to short time-series RS data. Sentinel-2 images were acquired in this study at six key phenological stages (rejuvenation stage, rising stage, jointing stage, heading stage, filling stage, filling-maturity stage) of winter wheat growth, and various vegetation indexes (VIs) at different fertility stages were calculated. Based on the characteristics of yield data continuity, the RReliefF algorithm was introduced to filter the optimal vegetation index combinations suitable for the yield estimation of winter wheat for all fertility stages. The Absolutely Objective Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (AOIAHP) was innovatively proposed to determine the proportional contribution of crop growth to yield formation in six different phenological stages. The selected VIs consisting of MTCI(RE2), EVI, REP, MTCI(RE1), RECI(RE1), NDVI(RE1), NDVI(RE3), NDVI(RE2), NDVI, and MSAVI were then fused with the weights of different fertility periods to obtain time-series weighted data. For the characteristics of short time length and a small number of sequences of RS time-series data in yield estimation, this study applied the multiplexed delayed embedding transformation (MDT) technique to realize the data augmentation of the original short time series. Tucker decomposition was performed on the block Hankel tensor (BHT) obtained after MDT enhancement, and the core tensor was extracted while preserving the intrinsic connection of the time-series data. Finally, the resulting multidimensional core tensor was trained with the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model to obtain the BHT-ARIMA model for wheat yield estimation. Compared to the performance of the BHT-ARIMA model with unweighted time-series data as input, the weighted time-series input significantly improves yield estimation accuracy. The coefficients of determination (R2) were improved from 0.325 to 0.583. The root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 492.990 to 323.637 kg/ha, the mean absolute error (MAE) dropped from 350.625 to 255.954, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) decreased from 4.332% to 3.186%. Besides, BHT-ARMA and BHT-CNN models were also used to compare with BHT-ARIMA. The results indicated that the BHT-ARIMA model still had the best yield prediction accuracy. The proposed method of this study will provide fast and accurate guidance for crop yield estimation and will be of great value for the processing and application of time-series RS data.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weighted input improved yield estimation accuracy significantly.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
yield estimation accuracye0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weighted time-series input significantly improves yield estimation accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2055 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weighted input improved R2 from 0.325 to 0.583.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
coefficients of determination (R2)e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0.583e0
Comparator
0.325e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coefficients of determination (R2) were improved from 0.325 to 0.583”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2129 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weighted input reduced yield-estimation RMSE from 492.990 to 323.637 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
root mean square error (RMSE)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
323.637 kg/hae0
Qualifier
492.990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root mean square error (RMSE) decreased from 492.990 to 323.637 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2131–2204 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weighted input reduced MAE from 350.625 to 255.954.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
mean absolute error (MAE)e0
Direction
droppede0
Value
255.954e0
Qualifier
350.625e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean absolute error (MAE) dropped from 350.625 to 255.954”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2206–2267 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weighted input reduced MAPE from 4.332% to 3.186%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
mean absolute percentage error (MAPE)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.186%e0
Qualifier
4.332%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) decreased from 4.332% to 3.186%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2346 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BHT-ARIMA had the best yield prediction accuracy among compared models.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Outcome
yield prediction accuracye0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
BHT-ARMA and BHT-CNN modelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the BHT-ARIMA model still had the best yield prediction accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2427–2518 · show in text ↑
e1

“BHT-ARMA and BHT-CNN models were also used to compare with BHT-ARIMA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2357–2425 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–480 · show in text ↑