Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

RAD-Seq and Ecological Niche Reveal Genetic Diversity, Phylogeny, and Geographic Distribution of Kadsura interior and Its Closely Related Species

Yuqing Dong; Xueping Wei; Tingyan Qiang; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Most plants of Kadsura have economic value and medicinal application. Among them, K. interior and its closely related species have been demonstrated to have definite efficacy. However, the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationship of Kadsura in terms of morphology and commonly used gene regions remain controversial, which adversely affects its rational application. In this study, a total of 107 individuals of K. interior , K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , K. oblongifolia , and K. coccinea were studied from the perspectives of genetic diversity, phylogeny, and ecology via single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) developed through restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq). Based on these SNPs, the genetic diversity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and population genetic structure were analyzed. Subsequently, divergence time estimation and differentiation scenario simulation were performed. Meanwhile, according to the species distribution records and bioclimatic variables, the Last Glacial Maximum and current potential distributions of five species were constructed, and the main ecological factors affecting the distribution of different species were extracted. The F ST calculated showed that there was a moderate degree of differentiation among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia , and there was a high degree of genetic differentiation between K. interior and the above species. The phylogenetic tree indicated that each of the species was monophyletic. The results of population genetic structure and divergence scenario simulation and D-statistics showed that there were admixture and gene flow among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia . The results of ecological niche modeling indicated that the distribution areas and the bioclimatic variables affecting the distribution of K. interior and its related species were different. This study explored the differences in the genetic divergence and geographical distribution patterns of K. interior and its related species, clarifying the uniqueness of K. interior compared to its relatives and providing a reference for their rational application in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three related Kadsura species showed moderate genetic differentiation.

Taxon
K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifoliaKadsura heteroclitaKadsura longipedunculataKadsura oblongifoliae0
Outcome
differentiatione0
Direction
moderatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kadsura heteroclita
Kadsura heteroclita · TaxonToby Y · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a moderate degree of differentiation among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia , and there was a high degree of genetic differentiation between K. interior and the above species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K. interior showed high genetic differentiation from those related species.

Taxon
K. interiorKadsura interiore0
Outcome
genetic differentiatione0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
the above speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“there was a moderate degree of differentiation among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia , and there was a high degree of genetic differentiation between K. interior and the above species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each studied Kadsura species was monophyletic.

Taxon
Kadsura interiorKadsura interiort0
Outcome
monophyletice0

Verbatim

e0

“The phylogenetic tree indicated that each of the species was monophyletic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kadsura interior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

admixture occurred among three related Kadsura species.

Taxon
K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifoliaKadsura heteroclitaKadsura longipedunculataKadsura oblongifoliae0
Outcome
admixturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kadsura heteroclita
Kadsura heteroclita · TaxonToby Y · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were admixture and gene flow among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

gene flow occurred among three related Kadsura species.

Taxon
K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifoliaKadsura heteroclitaKadsura longipedunculataKadsura oblongifoliae0
Outcome
gene flowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kadsura heteroclita
Kadsura heteroclita · TaxonToby Y · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were admixture and gene flow among K. heteroclita , K. longipedunculata , and K. oblongifolia .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

distribution areas differed between K. interior and related species.

Taxon
K. interiorKadsura interiore0
Outcome
distribution arease0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
its related speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“the distribution areas and the bioclimatic variables affecting the distribution of K. interior and its related species were different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

bioclimatic variables affecting the distribution differed between K. interior and related species.

Taxon
K. interiorKadsura interiore0
Outcome
bioclimatic variables affecting the distributione0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
its related speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“the distribution areas and the bioclimatic variables affecting the distribution of K. interior and its related species were different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1904 · show in text ↑