Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Approach to Demography of ALS-Resistant Glebionis coronaria as Influenced by Management Factors: Tillage, Allelopathic Crops and Herbicides

Zeineb Hada; Messaad Khammassi; Houda Jenfaoui; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Glebionis coronaria (L.) Cass. ex Spach is one of the most serious weeds in cereal crops in Northern Tunisia. Our previous studies have confirmed the presence of resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in G. coronaria, showing the evolution of cross-resistance through TS and NTS mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of (i) two tillage practices (conventional tillage and reduced tillage), (ii) three known allelopathic crops: Hordeum vulgare L. (Barley), Brassica napus L. (Rapeseed) and Triticum durum (Wheat) and (iii) herbicides belonging to different modes of action on the density, the cohort numbers and the growth of an ALS-inhibiting cross-resistant population of G. coronaria. Field experiments were conducted in two consecutive years (2017–2018 and 2018–2019) in the Fritissa-Mateur-Bizerte region. Our results revealed that barley considerably contributed to the decrease in G. coronaria’s density, cohort number, total biomass accumulation and plant height. The effect of rapeseed is likely dependent on the tillage practice and the timing of herbicide application, while G. coronaria could be successfully controlled in wheat using auxin herbicides. It is suggested that the management of resistant population of G. coronaria could be achieved by combining barely or rapeseed with right tillage practice and auxin herbicides’ application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley decreased Glebionis density and cohort number.

Treatment
barleye0
Interactor
G. coronariaGlebionis coronariae0weed
Outcome
G. coronaria’s density, cohort numbere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glebionis coronaria
Glebionis coronaria · InteractorRetama · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley considerably contributed to the decrease in G. coronaria’s density, cohort number, total biomass accumulation and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds in cereal crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley decreased Glebionis biomass accumulation and height.

Treatment
barleye0
Interactor
G. coronariaGlebionis coronariae0weed
Outcome
total biomass accumulation and plant heighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glebionis coronaria
Glebionis coronaria · InteractorRetama · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley considerably contributed to the decrease in G. coronaria’s density, cohort number, total biomass accumulation and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–998 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed effect likely depended on tillage practice and herbicide timing.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
tillage practice and the timing of herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
effect of rapeseede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of rapeseed is likely dependent on the tillage practice and the timing of herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin herbicides could control Glebionis in wheat.

Treatment
auxin herbicidese0
Interactor
G. coronariaGlebionis coronariae0weed
Outcome
G. coronariae0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glebionis coronaria
Glebionis coronaria · InteractorRetama · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. coronaria could be successfully controlled in wheat using auxin herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1191 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested combining barley or rapeseed with tillage and auxin herbicides to manage resistant Glebionis.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Interactor
G. coronariaGlebionis coronariae0weed
Outcome
management of resistant population of G. coronariae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glebionis coronaria
Glebionis coronaria · InteractorRetama · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the management of resistant population of G. coronaria could be achieved by combining barely or rapeseed with right tillage practice and auxin herbicides’ application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1380 · show in text ↑

herbicide · Glebionis coronaria · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.