Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Cotton Stalks Residues to Check Fertility Level of Soil, Yield and Energetics of Sweet Corn

K. Bhargavi Reddy; M. Malla Reddy; B. Padmaja; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on Impact of incorporation of shredded cotton stalks to influence soil fertility status along with production of succeeding sweet corn was organized at college farm, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad in the midst of rabi 2020-21. The demonstration was proportioned in Randomized Block Design (factorial) and replicated thrice. Treatments contain two residue management viz., Shredded cotton stalks incorporation and no incorporation and five levels of fertility levels viz., control, 75% RDF, 100% RDF, 125% RDF and 150% RDF (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer). Incorporation of cotton stalks did not significantly influenced the grain and fodder yield. Grain and Fodder yield was significantly higher in 125% RDF which was on par with 150% RDF. Incorporation of cotton stalks @ 5 t ha-1 (Residue management) before sowing of the succeeding sweet corn did not influence the energy ratio, energy productivity, productivity day-1. 125% RDF recorded higher energy ratio, energy productivity, while higher productivity day-1 was observed in 150% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton stalk incorporation did not significantly influence grain and fodder yield.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
Incorporation of cotton stalkse0
Outcome
grain and fodder yielde0
Direction
did not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of cotton stalks did not significantly influenced the grain and fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and fodder yield was significantly higher with 125% RDF, on par with 150% RDF.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
Grain and Fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
150% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and Fodder yield was significantly higher in 125% RDF which was on par with 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton stalk incorporation did not influence energy ratio, energy productivity or productivity per day.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
Incorporation of cotton stalks @ 5 t ha-1e0
Outcome
energy ratio, energy productivity, productivity day-1e0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of cotton stalks @ 5 t ha-1 (Residue management) before sowing of the succeeding sweet corn did not influence the energy ratio, energy productivity, productivity day-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF produced a higher energy ratio and energy productivity.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
energy ratio, energy productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“125% RDF recorded higher energy ratio, energy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150% RDF produced higher productivity per day.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
150% RDFe0
Outcome
productivity day-1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher productivity day-1 was observed in 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.