Abstract
Abstract The aim of this empirical field research was to show potential differences due to the precise application of herbicides in the quality and size of the carrot root yield and the amount of working liquid used compared to those for control samples. Empirical verification of the effectiveness of the developed technology, confirmed by statistical analyses of the obtained results, allows for a comparative assessment of this method with the conventional method of herbicide application used in this study. Due to the methodology used, it can be assumed that for carrots, the years were a random factor, and the experiments carried out were a series. It can be assumed that in the analysis of a series of experiments, for each of the examined features there are no differences between the groups and there is no interaction of the groups with the years. The yields of the groups weeded manually, sprayed in a conventional way, and weeded with precise spraying did not differ in a statistically significant way. In the precise application, a 20–30% lower herbicide consumption was observed, which has an impact on the protection of the environment and improves the economic effect of carrot production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Carrot yields did not differ significantly among manual weeding, conventional spraying, and precise spraying.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotat0 - Treatment
- weeded with precise sprayinge0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- weeded manually, sprayed in a conventional waye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yields of the groups weeded manually, sprayed in a conventional way, and weeded with precise spraying did not differ in a statistically significant way.”
t0“carrot fields”
Claim · model-written summary
Precise spraying used 20–30% less herbicide.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- precise applicatione0
- Outcome
- herbicide consumptione0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 20–30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the precise application, a 20–30% lower herbicide consumption was observed”
t0“carrot fields”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.