Paper · 2021 · Environmental & Socio-economic Studies

Plant invasions in Ukraine

Liudmyla V. Zavialova; Vira V. Protopopova; Oksana O. Kucher; et al.

18
claims
30
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract We present a comprehensive review of the plant invasions of 42 alien species and their impact on vegetation cover in Ukraine. Among these species, those currently posing the greatest threat to the environment have been identified. The structural features of this group were analyzed. In the life form spectrum the phanerophytes and therophytes are dominant, in the ecological spectrum the mesophytes are dominant, and kenophytes predominate at the time of immigration. Among the examined species, plants of North American origin predominate, agriophytes prevail by their degree of naturalization, and ergasiophytes are predominant by their way of entry. The participation of invasive species in natural and anthropogenic plant communities and biotopes was analyzed. These species are a stable component of grasses, scrub and forest habitats. Most of these invasive plants (33 species) are observed in anthropogenic habitats (I). Slightly fewer species of the studied group prefer habitat types E (25), F and G (22 each), although the largest invasions are observed exactly in these biotopes. Invasive species are characterized by eurytopicity. Four species have the greatest ecological plasticity, each of these is found in six types of habitats: Ailanthus altissima (B, F, G, I, J, H), Amaranthus retroflexus (C, E, F, G, I, J), Opuntia humifusa (B, E, F, G, H, I) and Xanthium albinum (B, C, E, F, G, I). Erigeron canadensis is found in five habitat types (C, E, F, G, I). The studied group is characterized by an insignificant regional specificity of the species composition, high invasive potential and stability of population reproduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Phanerophytes and therophytes dominate the invasive plant life-form spectrum.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
life form spectrume0
Direction
dominante0
Qualifier
phanerophytes and therophytese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the life form spectrum the phanerophytes and therophytes are dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–365 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mesophytes dominate the ecological spectrum of invasive plants.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
ecological spectrume0
Direction
dominante0
Qualifier
mesophytese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the ecological spectrum the mesophytes are dominant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–421 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Kenophytes predominate by immigration time.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
time of immigratione0
Direction
predominatee0
Qualifier
kenophytese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“kenophytes predominate at the time of immigration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

North American origin predominates among examined invasive plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
North American origine0
Direction
predominatee0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the examined species, plants of North American origin predominate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Agriophytes prevail by degree of naturalization.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
degree of naturalizatione0
Direction
prevaile0
Qualifier
agriophytese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“agriophytes prevail by their degree of naturalization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ergasiophytes predominate by entry route.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
way of entrye0
Direction
predominante0
Qualifier
ergasiophytese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“ergasiophytes are predominant by their way of entry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–661 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Invasive species are stable components of grass, scrub and forest habitats.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
stable component of grasses, scrub and forest habitatse0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“These species are a stable component of grasses, scrub and forest habitats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–850 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-three invasive plant species occur in anthropogenic habitat I.

Taxon
invasive plantse0
Outcome
observed in anthropogenic habitatse0
Value
33 speciese0
Setting
anthropogenic habitatse0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of these invasive plants (33 species) are observed in anthropogenic habitats (I).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-five studied invasive species prefer habitat type E.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
prefer habitat types Ee0
Value
25e0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“Slightly fewer species of the studied group prefer habitat types E (25), F and G (22 each)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two studied invasive species prefer habitat type F.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
prefer habitat typese0
Value
22 eache0
Qualifier
Fe0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“Slightly fewer species of the studied group prefer habitat types E (25), F and G (22 each)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two studied invasive species prefer habitat type G.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
prefer habitat typese0
Value
22 eache0
Qualifier
Ge0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“Slightly fewer species of the studied group prefer habitat types E (25), F and G (22 each)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The largest invasions occur in habitat types E, F and G.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
invasionse0
Direction
largeste0
Qualifier
these biotopese0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“the largest invasions are observed exactly in these biotopes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ailanthus altissima occurred in six habitat types.

Taxon
Ailanthus altissimaAilanthus altissimuse0
Outcome
found in six types of habitatse0
Value
six types of habitatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ailanthus altissimus
Ailanthus altissimus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four species have the greatest ecological plasticity, each of these is found in six types of habitats: Ailanthus altissima (B, F, G, I, J, H)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus retroflexus occurred in six habitat types.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Outcome
found in six types of habitatse0
Value
six types of habitatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four species have the greatest ecological plasticity, each of these is found in six types of habitats: Ailanthus altissima (B, F, G, I, J, H), Amaranthus retroflexus (C, E, F, G, I, J)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1337 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Opuntia humifusa occurred in six habitat types.

Taxon
Opuntia humifusaOpuntia humifusae0
Outcome
found in six types of habitatse0
Value
six types of habitatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia humifusa
Opuntia humifusa · TaxonTed Bodner, Southern Weed Science Society, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four species have the greatest ecological plasticity, each of these is found in six types of habitats: Ailanthus altissima (B, F, G, I, J, H), Amaranthus retroflexus (C, E, F, G, I, J), Opuntia humifusa (B, E, F, G, H, I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1374 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Xanthium albinum occurred in six habitat types.

Taxon
Xanthium albinumXanthium albinume0
Outcome
found in six types of habitatse0
Value
six types of habitatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Xanthium albinum
Xanthium albinum · TaxonChristian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four species have the greatest ecological plasticity, each of these is found in six types of habitats: Ailanthus altissima (B, F, G, I, J, H), Amaranthus retroflexus (C, E, F, G, I, J), Opuntia humifusa (B, E, F, G, H, I) and Xanthium albinum (B, C, E, F, G, I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1414 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Erigeron canadensis occurred in five habitat types.

Taxon
Erigeron canadensisErigeron canadensise0
Outcome
found in five habitat typese0
Value
five habitat typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erigeron canadensis
Erigeron canadensis · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh from Salt Lake City, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Erigeron canadensis is found in five habitat types (C, E, F, G, I).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1483 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The invasive group showed low regional specificity, high invasive potential and stable population reproduction.

Taxon
Plantt0
Outcome
insignificant regional specificity of the species composition, high invasive potential and stability of population reproductione0

Verbatim

t0

“Plant invasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“The studied group is characterized by an insignificant regional specificity of the species composition, high invasive potential and stability of population reproduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1653 · show in text ↑