Paper · 2002 · Journal of Vegetation Science

Light partitioning among species and species replacement in early successional grasslands

Marinus J.A. Werger; Tadaki Hirose; Heinjo J. During; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. We studied canopy structure, shoot architecture and light harvesting efficiencies of the species (photon flux captured per unit above-ground plant mass) in a series of exclosures of different age (up to 4.5 yr) in originally heavily grazed grassland in N Japan.Vegetation height and Leaf Area Index (LAI) increased in the series and Zoysia japonica, the dominant in the beginning, was replaced by the much taller Miscanthus sinensis. We showed how this displacement in dominance can be explained by inherent constraints on the above-ground architecture of these two species. In all stands light capture of plants increased with their above-ground biomass but taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting. Some subordinate species grew disproportionally large leaf areas and persisted in the shady undergrowth. Some other species first grew taller and managed to stay in the better-lit parts of the canopy, but ultimately failed to match the height growth of their neighbours in this early successional series. Their light harvesting efficiencies declined and this probably led to their exclusion. By contrast, species that maintained their position high in the canopy managed to persist in the vegetation despite their relatively low light harvesting efficiencies. In the tallest stands ‘later successional’ species had higher light harvesting efficiencies for the same plant height than ‘early successional’ species which was mostly the result of the greater area to mass ratio (specific leaf area, SLA) of their leaves. This shows how plant stature, plasticity in above-ground biomass partitioning, and architectural constraints determine the ability of plants to efficiently capture light, which helps to explain species replacement in this early successional series.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation height and Leaf Area Index increased along the series of exclosures of increasing age.

Taxon
grasslandst0
Outcome
Vegetation height and Leaf Area Index (LAI)e1
Direction
increasede1

Verbatim

t0

“early successional grasslands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetation height and Leaf Area Index (LAI) increased in the series”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zoysia japonica, dominant at the start, was replaced by the much taller Miscanthus sinensis.

Taxon
Zoysia japonicaZoysia japonicae1
Outcome
replaced by the much taller Miscanthus sinensise1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zoysia japonica
Zoysia japonica · TaxonShow_ryu · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Zoysia japonica, the dominant in the beginning, was replaced by the much taller Miscanthus sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–442 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the displacement in dominance can be explained by inherent constraints on the above-ground architecture of the two species.

Taxon
Zoysia japonicaZoysia japonicae1
Outcome
displacement in dominancee2
Qualifier
inherent constraints on the above-ground architecturee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zoysia japonica
Zoysia japonica · TaxonShow_ryu · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Zoysia japonica, the dominant in the beginning, was replaced by the much taller Miscanthus sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–442 · show in text ↑
e2

“this displacement in dominance can be explained by inherent constraints on the above-ground architecture of these two species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–583 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In all stands, light capture of plants increased with their above-ground biomass.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Organ / stage
above-grounde1
Outcome
light capturee1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
all standse1

Verbatim

e1

“In all stands light capture of plants increased with their above-ground biomass but taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–739 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
efficient in light harvestinge1
Direction
not necessarily more efficiente1
Setting
all standse1

Verbatim

e1

“In all stands light capture of plants increased with their above-ground biomass but taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some subordinate species grew disproportionally large leaf areas and persisted in the shady undergrowth.

Taxon
subordinate speciese1
Outcome
grew disproportionally large leaf areas and persisted in the shady undergrowthe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Some subordinate species grew disproportionally large leaf areas and persisted in the shady undergrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some other species first grew taller and stayed in the better-lit canopy but ultimately failed to match the height growth of their neighbours.

Taxon
Some other speciese1
Outcome
failed to match the height growth of their neighbourse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Some other species first grew taller and managed to stay in the better-lit parts of the canopy, but ultimately failed to match the height growth of their neighbours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light harvesting efficiencies of those species declined.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
light harvesting efficienciese2
Direction
declinede2

Verbatim

e1

“Some other species first grew taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–882 · show in text ↑
e2

“Their light harvesting efficiencies declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1090 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that the decline in light harvesting efficiency probably led to the exclusion of those species.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
exclusione2
Qualifier
probablye2

Verbatim

e1

“Some other species first grew taller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–882 · show in text ↑
e2

“Their light harvesting efficiencies declined and this probably led to their exclusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species that kept their position high in the canopy persisted in the vegetation despite relatively low light harvesting efficiencies.

Taxon
speciese1
Outcome
persist in the vegetatione1
Qualifier
relatively low light harvesting efficienciese1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“species that maintained their position high in the canopy managed to persist in the vegetation despite their relatively low light harvesting efficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the tallest stands, later successional species had higher light harvesting efficiencies than early successional species at the same plant height.

Taxon
‘later successional’ speciese1
Outcome
light harvesting efficienciese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
‘early successional’ speciese1
Setting
tallest standse1

Verbatim

e1

“In the tallest stands ‘later successional’ species had higher light harvesting efficiencies for the same plant height than ‘early successional’ species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1452 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher light harvesting efficiency of later successional species was mostly the result of the greater specific leaf area of their leaves.

Taxon
‘later successional’ speciese1
Outcome
higher light harvesting efficienciese1
Qualifier
greater area to mass ratio (specific leaf area, SLA)e2

Verbatim

e1

“In the tallest stands ‘later successional’ species had higher light harvesting efficiencies for the same plant height than ‘early successional’ species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1452 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was mostly the result of the greater area to mass ratio (specific leaf area, SLA) of their leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1556 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that plant stature, plasticity in above-ground biomass partitioning and architectural constraints determine the ability of plants to capture light efficiently.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
ability of plants to efficiently capture lighte1
Qualifier
plant stature, plasticity in above-ground biomass partitioning, and architectural constraintse1

Verbatim

e1

“plant stature, plasticity in above-ground biomass partitioning, and architectural constraints determine the ability of plants to efficiently capture light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1727 · show in text ↑