Paper · 2013 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

EFFICIENCY OF SOME INSECTICIDES SEQUENCE ON COTTON BOLLWORMS AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SOME BIOCIDES ON PINK BOLLWORM LARVAE

M Salama; Abd El-Mohsen; M El-Baki; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiments were carried out during the cotton seasons of 2008 and 2009 in Sakha Agricultural Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate to evaluate the efficiency of certain insecticidal sequences against pink and spiny bollworms larvae. The aim of the insecticidal sequences is to get the most effective control one against the bollworms. The data revealed that the infestation of cotton fields with both bollworms in both successive seasons started with few number of 1st and 2nd instar larvae on late July, but increased gradually till the end of each season. In general all treatments had slight and moderate reduction in bollworms where the reduction rates ranged between 34.18 and 52.43%. The sequences of biocides (Spinosad, Azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis) was efficient in reducing larval population when sprayed three times alone or alternative with other three sprays at 15 days intervals. Spinosad in three successive sprays was the best sequences in controlling bollworms induced 48.66% average reduction, using the conventional insecticides with biocides, IGRs and antimolting compounds caused good average reduction on larval population. While the sequence of methomyl followed by oxymatrine + prosuler and lambdacyhalothrin induced the least reduction which being 38.02% reduction.With respect to the histopathological effects of the tested biocides, midgut histological sections were carried out on the 2nd and 4th instar larvae of Pink bollworm (PBW) with field concentration of the three tested biocides. Spinosad was the most effective compounds in causing aberrations in the midgut layers. Also, the pathological effect of the tested biocides was more serious on the 2nd instar larvae than the 4th one. Accordingly, spinosad, IGRs, antimolting compounds and biocides could be included with conventional insecticides to get the highest reduction in bollworms population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton bollworm infestation began in late July and increased through the season.

Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
infestation of cotton fields with both bollwormse0
Direction
increased graduallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data revealed that the infestation of cotton fields with both bollworms in both successive seasons started with few number of 1st and 2nd instar larvae on late July, but increased gradually till the end of each season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments reduced bollworms by 34.18 to 52.43%.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
bollwormse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
34.18 and 52.43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all treatments had slight and moderate reduction in bollworms where the reduction rates ranged between 34.18 and 52.43%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocide sequences reduced larval populations with three sprays alone or alternating sprays.

Treatment
Spinosad, Azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensise0
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
15 days intervalse0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sequences of biocides (Spinosad, Azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis) was efficient in reducing larval population when sprayed three times alone or alternative with other three sprays at 15 days intervals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three successive Spinosad sprays reduced bollworms by 48.66% on average.

Treatment
Spinosad in three successive sprayse0
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
bollwormse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
48.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad in three successive sprays was the best sequences in controlling bollworms induced 48.66% average reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional insecticides with biocides, IGRs and antimolting compounds reduced larval population.

Treatment
conventional insecticides with biocides, IGRs and antimolting compoundse0
Outcome
larval populatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the conventional insecticides with biocides, IGRs and antimolting compounds caused good average reduction on larval population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methomyl followed by oxymatrine plus prosuler and lambdacyhalothrin had the least reduction, 38.02%.

Treatment
methomyl followed by oxymatrine + prosuler and lambdacyhalothrine0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
least reductione0
Value
38.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sequence of methomyl followed by oxymatrine + prosuler and lambdacyhalothrin induced the least reduction which being 38.02% reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad caused the greatest aberrations in pink bollworm larval midgut layers.

Treatment
Spinosade0
Outcome
aberrations in the midgut layerse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinosad was the most effective compounds in causing aberrations in the midgut layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1630 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocide pathology was more severe in second than fourth instar larvae.

Organ / stage
2nd instar larvaee0
Outcome
pathological effecte0
Direction
more seriouse0
Comparator
4th onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pathological effect of the tested biocides was more serious on the 2nd instar larvae than the 4th one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including spinosad, IGRs, antimolting compounds and biocides with conventional insecticides.

Outcome
highest reduction in bollworms populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad, IGRs, antimolting compounds and biocides could be included with conventional insecticides to get the highest reduction in bollworms population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1910 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON BOLLWORMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azadirachtin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spinosad · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

insecticide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 51 positive, 25 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

application · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.