Paper · 2015 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Performance and Stability Analysis of Several Yellow Maize Hybrids

Kh Ibrahim; M Adel; Mahmoud; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Performance and stability of 13 maize single cross hybrids were estimated under five different environments in Egypt during 2013 summer season. A randomized complete block design was used at each environment. Mean squares due to environments, Genotypes and G x E interaction were highly significant for grain yield and other agronomic traits. Based on combined data H2 possessed the highest grain yield (5.15 kg/plot) and significantly outyielded the check hybrid H13 (4.59 kg/plot). According to stability analysis the G x E (linear) interaction was not significant and had low portion of the G x E interaction when compared to the environment linear mean of squares for grain yield and the other studied. If the mean yield ( ), regression coefficient value (bi) and the deviation from the regression are considered together, then the most stable hybrid would be H2 and H9. The most stable hybrids according to the ecovalence method were H10, H8, H1, H9. These hybrids were not the best ranked for grain yield, except H9, which possessed the first rank for grain yield with 5.15 kg plote-1 (Plot size is 9.6 m2) and is considered as a promising hybrid for stability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment, genotype and their interaction had highly significant effects on grain yield and agronomic traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yield and other agronomic traitse0
Setting
environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean squares due to environments, Genotypes and G x E interaction were highly significant for grain yield and other agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 yielded 5.15 kg/plot and significantly exceeded check hybrid H13.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
H2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
outyieldede0
Value
5.15 kg/plote0
Qualifier
4.59 kg/plote0
Comparator
H13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2 possessed the highest grain yield (5.15 kg/plot) and significantly outyielded the check hybrid H13 (4.59 kg/plot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The linear genotype by environment interaction for grain yield was not significant and had a low share of the interaction.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
G x E (linear) interactione0
Direction
low portione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the G x E (linear) interaction was not significant and had low portion of the G x E interaction when compared to the environment linear mean of squares for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 and H9 were the most stable under combined mean yield and regression criteria.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most stable hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most stable hybrid would be H2 and H9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecovalence analysis identified H10, H8, H1 and H9 as the most stable hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most stable hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most stable hybrids according to the ecovalence method were H10, H8, H1, H9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H9 ranked first for grain yield at 5.15 kg plote-1 and was considered promising for stability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
H9e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
first ranke0
Value
5.15 kg plote-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H9, which possessed the first rank for grain yield with 5.15 kg plote-1 (Plot size is 9.6 m2) and is considered as a promising hybrid for stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑