Paper · 2004 · Evolution

COMPARATIVE POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURES AND LOCAL ADAPTATION OF TWO MUTUALISTS

Bruce Anderson; Isabelle Olivieri; Mathieu Lourmas; et al.

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Similar patterns of dispersal and gene flow between closely associated organisms may promote local adaptation and coevolutionary processes. We compare the genetic structures of the two species of a plant genus (Roridula gorgonias and R. dentata) and their respective obligately associated hemipteran mutualists (Pameridea roridulae and P. marlothi) using allozymes. In addition, we determine whether genetic structure is related to differences in host choice by Pameridea. Allozyme variation was found to be very structured among plant populations but less so among hemipteran populations. Strong genetic structuring among hemipteran populations was only evident when large distances isolated the plant populations on which they live. Although genetic distances among plant populations were correlated with genetic distances among hemipteran populations, genetic distances of both plants and hemipterans were better correlated with geographic distance. Because Roridula and Pameridea have different scales of gene flow, adaptation at the local population level is unlikely. However, the restricted gene flow of both plants and hemipterans could enable adaptation to occur at a regional level. In choice experiments, the hemipteran (Pameridea) has a strong preference for its carnivorous host plant (Roridula) above unrelated host plants. Pameridea also prefers its host species to its closely related sister species. Specialization at the specific level is likely to reinforce cospeciation processes in this mutualism. However, Pameridea does not exhibit intraspecific preferences toward plants from their natal populations above plants from isolated, non-natal populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allozyme variation was strongly structured among populations of the two Roridula species.

Taxon
Roridula gorgonias and R. dentataRoridula gorgoniasRoridula dentatae0
Outcome
Allozyme variatione1
Qualifier
very structured among plant populationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roridula gorgonias
Roridula gorgonias · TaxonTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Roridula dentata
Roridula dentata · TaxonNick Helme · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roridula gorgonias and R. dentata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Allozyme variation was found to be very structured among plant populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allozyme variation among populations of the Pameridea hemipterans was less structured than among the plant populations.

Taxon
Pameridea roridulae and P. marlothie0
Outcome
Allozyme variatione1
Qualifier
less so among hemipteran populationse1

Verbatim

e0

“Pameridea roridulae and P. marlothi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Allozyme variation was found to be very structured among plant populations but less so among hemipteran populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong genetic structuring among hemipteran populations was evident only when large distances isolated the plant populations they live on.

Taxon
Pameridea roridulae and P. marlothie0
Outcome
Strong genetic structuring among hemipteran populationse1
Qualifier
only evident when large distances isolated the plant populationse1

Verbatim

e0

“Pameridea roridulae and P. marlothi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Strong genetic structuring among hemipteran populations was only evident when large distances isolated the plant populations on which they live”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–733 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic distances among plant populations were correlated with genetic distances among hemipteran populations.

Taxon
Roridula gorgonias and R. dentataRoridula gorgoniasRoridula dentatae0
Outcome
genetic distances among plant populationse1
Comparator
genetic distances among hemipteran populationse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roridula gorgonias
Roridula gorgonias · TaxonTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Roridula dentata
Roridula dentata · TaxonNick Helme · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roridula gorgonias and R. dentata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–244 · show in text ↑
e1

“genetic distances among plant populations were correlated with genetic distances among hemipteran populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–853 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic distances of both plants and hemipterans were better correlated with geographic distance.

Taxon
plants and hemipteranse0
Outcome
genetic distancese0
Direction
better correlatede0
Comparator
geographic distancee0

Verbatim

e0

“genetic distances of both plants and hemipterans were better correlated with geographic distance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In choice experiments Pameridea strongly preferred its carnivorous host plant Roridula over unrelated host plants.

Taxon
PamerideaPamerideae0
Interactor
RoridulaRoridulae0host
Outcome
strong preferencee0
Comparator
unrelated host plantse0
Setting
choice experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pameridea
Pameridea · Taxonmagriet b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Roridula
Roridula · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Polypompholyx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In choice experiments, the hemipteran (Pameridea) has a strong preference for its carnivorous host plant (Roridula) above unrelated host plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pameridea also preferred its host plant species over the closely related sister plant species.

Taxon
PamerideaPamerideae0
Interactor
host speciese0host
Outcome
prefers its host speciese0
Comparator
its closely related sister speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pameridea
Pameridea · Taxonmagriet b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pameridea also prefers its host species to its closely related sister species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pameridea showed no intraspecific preference for plants from its natal populations over plants from isolated, non-natal populations.

Taxon
PamerideaPamerideae0
Outcome
intraspecific preferencese0
Comparator
plants from isolated, non-natal populationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pameridea
Pameridea · Taxonmagriet b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pameridea does not exhibit intraspecific preferences toward plants from their natal populations above plants from isolated, non-natal populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1673 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Because Roridula and Pameridea differ in scale of gene flow, adaptation at the local population level is judged unlikely.

Taxon
Roridula and PamerideaRoridulaPamerideae0
Outcome
adaptation at the local population levele0
Qualifier
different scales of gene flowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roridula
Roridula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Polypompholyx · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pameridea
Pameridea · Taxonmagriet b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because Roridula and Pameridea have different scales of gene flow, adaptation at the local population level is unlikely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1072 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The restricted gene flow of both plants and hemipterans could enable adaptation at a regional level.

Taxon
plants and hemipteranse0
Outcome
adaptation to occur at a regional levele0
Qualifier
restricted gene flowe0

Verbatim

e0

“the restricted gene flow of both plants and hemipterans could enable adaptation to occur at a regional level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1191 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Specialization at the species level is likely to reinforce cospeciation processes in this mutualism.

Outcome
cospeciation processese0
Qualifier
Specialization at the specific levele0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Specialization at the specific level is likely to reinforce cospeciation processes in this mutualism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1517 · show in text ↑