Paper · 2002 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Relationship Between Leaf Area Index and Yield in Double-Crop and Full-Season Soybean Systems

Sean Malone; D. Ames Herbert; David L. Holshouser

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Previous research indicates a correlation between leaf area index (LAI) and yield of full-season soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], which is a single crop planted early in the season. Leaf area index values of at least 3.5–4.0 in the reproductive stages are required for maximum potential yield. It is unknown how yields of double-crop soybean, which is planted late into harvested small grain fields, respond to changes in leaf area index. We hypothesized that double-crop soybean would be more sensitive to defoliation than full-season soybean. This study used linear and linear plateau models to describe the yield response of full-season and double-crop soybean to reductions in leaf area index through manual defoliation, and evaluated the yield response of double-crop soybean to reductions in leaf area index through natural insect defoliation. From 15 manual defoliation experiments over 3 yr, significant linear decreases in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5, whereas yields usually reached a plateau at higher leaf area index levels. Average yield loss was 769 ± 319 kg ha−1 for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau; average maximum yield was 3,484 ± 735 kg ha−1. From eight field experiments over 2 yr, insect defoliators had no effect on double-crop soybean yield; leaf area index levels were above 4.0 by the developmental stage when leaf area index estimates were taken (R3 to R6). Therefore, double-crop soybean that maintains leaf area index values above the 3.5–4.0 critical level by mid-reproductive developmental stages can tolerate defoliating pests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual defoliation caused significant linear yield decreases in full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index was below 3.5–4.0 at R4 to R5, relative to higher leaf area index.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
manual defoliatione0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
decreasese1
Comparator
higher leaf area index levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From 15 manual defoliation experiments over 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant linear decreases in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1073 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas yields usually reached a plateau at higher leaf area index levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of soybean usually reached a plateau at higher leaf area index levels.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
reached a plateaue2
Comparator
higher leaf area index levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significant linear decreases in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1073 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas yields usually reached a plateau at higher leaf area index levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average yield loss was 769 ± 319 kg ha−1 for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
yield losse3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
769 ± 319 kg ha−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significant linear decreases in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1073 · show in text ↑
e3

“Average yield loss was 769 ± 319 kg ha−1 for each unit decrease in leaf area index below the plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average maximum soybean yield was 3,484 ± 735 kg ha−1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
maximum yielde4
Value
3,484 ± 735 kg ha−1e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significant linear decreases in yield occurred in both full-season and double-crop soybean when leaf area index values were below 3.5–4.0 by developmental stages R4 to R5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1073 · show in text ↑
e4

“average maximum yield was 3,484 ± 735 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect defoliators had no effect on double-crop soybean yield in field experiments.

Taxon
double-crop soybeane5
Treatment
insect defoliatorse5
Interactor
insect defoliatorse5pest
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
had no effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“From eight field experiments over 2 yr, insect defoliators had no effect on double-crop soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1400 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-crop soybean that keeps leaf area index above the 3.5–4.0 critical level can tolerate defoliating pests.

Taxon
double-crop soybeane6
Treatment
leaf area index values above the 3.5–4.0 critical levele6
Interactor
defoliating pestse6pest
Outcome
defoliating pestse6
Direction
can toleratee6

Verbatim

e6

“double-crop soybean that maintains leaf area index values above the 3.5–4.0 critical level by mid-reproductive developmental stages can tolerate defoliating pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1694 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 33 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.