Paper · 1963 · American Journal of Botany

A Glossopteris Flora from the Ohio Range, Antarctica

Arthur A. Cridland

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cridland, Arthur A. (Ohio State U., Columbus.) A Glossopteris flora from the Ohio Range, Antarctica. Amer. Jour. Bot. 50(2): 186–195. Illus. 1963.—Leaves of Glossopteris indica are the commonest fossils in the Mount Glossopteris Formation on Mount Schopf. Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils. These remains, and associated animal fossils, suggest that the Mount Glossopteris Formation is Permian. The plants evidently grew in a seasonal but favorable climate. These growth conditions indirectly support paleomagnetic calculations which indicate that in Late Permian time, Mount Schopf lay near latitude 50°S.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glossopteris indica leaves are the most common fossils in the formation.

Taxon
Glossopteris indicae0
Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
commonest fossilse0
Setting
Mount Glossopteris Formation on Mount Schopfe0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of Glossopteris indica are the commonest fossils in the Mount Glossopteris Formation on Mount Schopf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glossopteris ampla fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
Glossopteris amplae0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. anguslifolia fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
G. anguslifoliae0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. damudica fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
G. damudicae0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. browniana fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
G. brownianae0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arberiella fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
Arberiellae0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samaropsis fossils were present in the formation.

Taxon
Samaropsise0
Outcome
fossils presente0

Verbatim

e0

“Other fossils present are: Glossopteris ampla, G. anguslifolia, G. damudica, G. browniana, detached scales, sporangia of Arberiella containing bisaccate pollen grains, seeds of Samaropsis (principally S. longii), and some obscure fossils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–494 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fossil assemblage suggests a Permian age for the formation.

Outcome
Permiane0
Setting
Mount Glossopteris Formatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These remains, and associated animal fossils, suggest that the Mount Glossopteris Formation is Permian.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glossopteris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–14 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fossil plants evidently grew in a seasonal but favorable climate.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
seasonal but favorable climatee0

Verbatim

e0

“The plants evidently grew in a seasonal but favorable climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–661 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inferred plant growth conditions indirectly support a Late Permian location near 50°S for Mount Schopf.

Outcome
growth conditionse0
Value
50°Se0
Setting
Mount Schopfe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These growth conditions indirectly support paleomagnetic calculations which indicate that in Late Permian time, Mount Schopf lay near latitude 50°S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glossopteris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–14 · show in text ↑