Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season 2011-2012 at Student Instructional Farm (SIF), C.S.A.U.A&T Kanpur. Eight treatments were tested in three replicated Randomized Block Design. Result found that significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments. The minimum grain yield (19.15 q/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS). The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments. While Benefit:Cost ratio was significantly higher (1.96) with application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) over rest of the treatments except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/ha. The minimum gross income (Rs 69419/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) while the minimum net income and B:C ratio was found in treatment RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Combined RDF and vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave the highest grain yield of mungbean, 22.75 q/ha, compared with the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- significantly bettere1
- Value
- 22.75 q/hae1
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e1“significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined RDF and vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly better growth and yield attributes in mungbean than the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae1
- Outcome
- growth attributes, yield attributese1
- Direction
- significantly bettere1
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e1“significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF alone gave the minimum grain yield of mungbean, 19.15 q/ha.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- minimume2
- Value
- 19.15 q/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e2“The minimum grain yield (19.15 q/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly higher gross income than the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae3
- Outcome
- gross incomee3
- Direction
- significantly highere3
- Value
- Rs 81575e3
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e3“The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly higher net profit than the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae3
- Outcome
- net profite3
- Direction
- significantly highere3
- Value
- Rs 35725e3
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e3“The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF alone gave a significantly higher benefit:cost ratio, 1.96, than the other treatments, except those at par with RDF plus vermicompost at 2.0 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e4
- Outcome
- Benefit:Cost ratioe4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
- Value
- 1.96e4
- Qualifier
- except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/hae4
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e4“While Benefit:Cost ratio was significantly higher (1.96) with application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) over rest of the treatments except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF alone gave the minimum gross income of mungbean, Rs 69419/ha.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e5
- Outcome
- gross incomee5
- Direction
- minimume5
- Value
- Rs 69419/hae5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e5“The minimum gross income (Rs 69419/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus FYM at 6.0 t/ha gave the minimum net income and benefit:cost ratio of mungbean.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/hae6
- Outcome
- net income and B:C ratioe6
- Direction
- minimume6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”
e6“while the minimum net income and B:C ratio was found in treatment RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/ha”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
371 papers more in this group
See all 375 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.