Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Efficacy of Botanicals and Bio-agents against Web blight in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Thaneshwar Vishram Singh; Jai Prakash; Manoj Kumar; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season 2011-2012 at Student Instructional Farm (SIF), C.S.A.U.A&T Kanpur. Eight treatments were tested in three replicated Randomized Block Design. Result found that significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments. The minimum grain yield (19.15 q/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS). The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments. While Benefit:Cost ratio was significantly higher (1.96) with application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) over rest of the treatments except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/ha. The minimum gross income (Rs 69419/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) while the minimum net income and B:C ratio was found in treatment RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF and vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave the highest grain yield of mungbean, 22.75 q/ha, compared with the other treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Value
22.75 q/hae1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF and vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly better growth and yield attributes in mungbean than the other treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae1
Outcome
growth attributes, yield attributese1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly better growth attributes, yield attributes and grain yield (22.75 q/ha) was obtained with combined application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF alone gave the minimum grain yield of mungbean, 19.15 q/ha.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
minimume2
Value
19.15 q/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“The minimum grain yield (19.15 q/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly higher gross income than the other treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae3
Outcome
gross incomee3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
Rs 81575e3
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus vermicompost at 5.0 t/ha gave significantly higher net profit than the other treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/hae3
Outcome
net profite3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
Rs 35725e3
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of RDF + vermicompost @ 5.0 t/ha was also found significantly higher gross income (Rs 81575) and net profit (Rs 35725) over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF alone gave a significantly higher benefit:cost ratio, 1.96, than the other treatments, except those at par with RDF plus vermicompost at 2.0 t/ha.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e4
Outcome
Benefit:Cost ratioe4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
1.96e4
Qualifier
except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/hae4
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“While Benefit:Cost ratio was significantly higher (1.96) with application of RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS) over rest of the treatments except at par with RDF + vermicompost @ 2.0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF alone gave the minimum gross income of mungbean, Rs 69419/ha.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)e5
Outcome
gross incomee5
Direction
minimume5
Value
Rs 69419/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“The minimum gross income (Rs 69419/ha) was received in treatment RDF(120:60:40:30 Kg/ha NPKS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus FYM at 6.0 t/ha gave the minimum net income and benefit:cost ratio of mungbean.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/hae6
Outcome
net income and B:C ratioe6
Direction
minimume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“while the minimum net income and B:C ratio was found in treatment RDF + FYM @ 6.0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1019 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.