Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

WSRD-Net: A Convolutional Neural Network-Based Arbitrary-Oriented Wheat Stripe Rust Detection Method

Haiyun Liu; Lin Jiao; Rujing Wang; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat stripe rusts are responsible for the major reduction in production and economic losses in the wheat industry. Thus, accurate detection of wheat stripe rust is critical to improving wheat quality and the agricultural economy. At present, the results of existing wheat stripe rust detection methods based on convolutional neural network (CNN) are not satisfactory due to the arbitrary orientation of wheat stripe rust, with a large aspect ratio. To address these problems, a WSRD-Net method based on CNN for detecting wheat stripe rust is developed in this study. The model is a refined single-stage rotation detector based on the RetinaNet, by adding the feature refinement module (FRM) into the rotation RetinaNet network to solve the problem of feature misalignment of wheat stripe rust with a large aspect ratio. Furthermore, we have built an oriented annotation dataset of in-field wheat stripe rust images, called the wheat stripe rust dataset 2021 (WSRD2021). The performance of WSRD-Net is compared to that of the state-of-the-art oriented object detection models, and results show that WSRD-Net can obtain 60.8% AP and 73.8% Recall on the wheat stripe rust dataset, higher than the other four oriented object detection models. Furthermore, through the comparison with horizontal object detection models, it is found that WSRD-Net outperforms horizontal object detection models on localization for corresponding disease areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study provides an oriented annotation dataset of field wheat stripe rust images.

Outcome
oriented annotation dataset of in-field wheat stripe rust imagese0
Setting
in-field wheat stripe rust imagese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we have built an oriented annotation dataset of in-field wheat stripe rust images, called the wheat stripe rust dataset 2021 (WSRD2021)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–969 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WSRD-Net achieved 60.8% average precision for wheat stripe rust detection, above four oriented detectors.

Outcome
APe0
Direction
highere0
Value
60.8%e0
Comparator
other four oriented object detection modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WSRD-Net can obtain 60.8% AP and 73.8% Recall on the wheat stripe rust dataset, higher than the other four oriented object detection models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Stripe Rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WSRD-Net achieved 73.8% recall for wheat stripe rust detection, above four oriented detectors.

Outcome
Recalle0
Direction
highere0
Value
73.8%e0
Comparator
other four oriented object detection modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WSRD-Net can obtain 60.8% AP and 73.8% Recall on the wheat stripe rust dataset, higher than the other four oriented object detection models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Stripe Rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WSRD-Net localized wheat stripe rust disease areas better than horizontal object detectors.

Outcome
localization for corresponding disease arease0
Direction
outperformse0
Comparator
horizontal object detection modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WSRD-Net outperforms horizontal object detection models on localization for corresponding disease areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Stripe Rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑