Paper · 2022 · Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology

IMPACT OF FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENT FUNGICIDES ON WHEAT STRIPE RUST EPIDEMICS AND GRAIN YIELD

Yasir Ali; Tatheer Abbas; Hafiz M. Aatif; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The stripe rust of wheat caused severe grain yield losses in Pakistan and all over the world. The present investigation involved two replicated experiments conducted in the research area of Bahuddin Zakriya University, Bahadur Sub campus Layyah during the 2018-2019 and 2019 -2020 cropping seasons by following the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). In both experiments, four different fungicides viz., Metiram @ 625g/ha; Sulphur @ 2500g/ha; Propiconazole @ 625ml/ha and Difenaconazole @ 375g/ha were evaluated to determine their impact on stripe rust severity and grain yield. Data on disease severity were recorded by using the modified Cobbs scale whereas; a number of grain/spike and thousand-grain weight was recorded after harvesting the crop. All four applied fungicides reduced the stripe rust severity as compared to control. However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%). Grain yield was significantly increased with the foliar application of fungicides during both successive years. The present investigation could play an important role in controlling stripe rust epidemics and enhancing grain yield in central Asian countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metiram reduced wheat stripe rust severity versus control.

Treatment
Metirame0
Outcome
stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four applied fungicides reduced the stripe rust severity as compared to control. However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur reduced wheat stripe rust severity versus control.

Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four applied fungicides reduced the stripe rust severity as compared to control. However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole reduced wheat stripe rust severity versus control.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four applied fungicides reduced the stripe rust severity as compared to control. However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenaconazole reduced wheat stripe rust severity versus control.

Treatment
Difenaconazolee0
Outcome
stripe rust severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four applied fungicides reduced the stripe rust severity as compared to control. However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenaconazole controlled stripe rust with reported value 22.2%.

Treatment
Difenaconazolee0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
22.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenaconazole controlled stripe rust with reported value 21.1%.

Treatment
Difenaconazolee0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
21.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole controlled stripe rust with reported value 21.6%.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
21.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole controlled stripe rust with reported value 20.5%.

Treatment
Propiconazolee0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
20.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur controlled stripe rust with reported value 20.7%.

Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
20.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur controlled stripe rust with reported value 19.9%.

Treatment
Sulphure0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
19.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metiram controlled stripe rust with reported value 20.1%.

Treatment
Metirame0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
20.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metiram controlled stripe rust with reported value 19.4%.

Treatment
Metirame0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
19.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, maximum disease was controlled by Difenaconazole during both rating seasons 2018-19 (22.2%) and 2019-2020 (21.1%) followed by Propiconazole (21.6% & 20.5%), Sulphur (20.7% & 19.9%) and Metiram (20.1% & 19.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicides significantly increased wheat grain yield in both years.

Treatment
foliar application of fungicidese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both successive yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly increased with the foliar application of fungicides during both successive years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

propiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

metiram · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.