Abstract
AbstractTen different IPM modules were evaluated against mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). The treatment schedule comprising two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.005%) caused maximum reduction of aphid population with the cumulative mean of 77.29 and 79.11% after 3 days of spray, during 1st and 2nd years, respectively. It was followed by the treatment thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.005%. The maximum seed yield (3,899.33 and 3,949.33 g/plot) was obtained in the treatment schedule consisting of two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.005%. The maximum net return was also recorded in the same treatment (? 15,676) with highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.32.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.005%) caused the maximum reduction of mustard aphid population, with cumulative means of 77.29 and 79.11% after 3 days of spray in the 1st and 2nd years.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0 - Treatment
- two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.005%)e1
- Interactor
- mustard aphid
Lipaphis erysimie0pest - Outcome
- aphid populatione1
- Direction
- maximum reductione1
- Value
- 77.29 and 79.11%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.)”
e1“two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.005%) caused maximum reduction of aphid population with the cumulative mean of 77.29 and 79.11% after 3 days of spray, during 1st and 2nd years, respectively”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment with thiamethoxam 25 WG at 0.005% ranked next after the imidacloprid schedule in reducing aphid population.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.005%e0
- Outcome
- followed bye0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was followed by the treatment thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.005%”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum seed yield (3,899.33 and 3,949.33 g/plot in the two years) was obtained with two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 0.005%.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.005%e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3,899.33 and 3,949.33 g/plote0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum seed yield (3,899.33 and 3,949.33 g/plot) was obtained in the treatment schedule consisting of two sprays of imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.005%”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum net return was recorded in the same imidacloprid treatment, at 15,676 (currency symbol unreadable in the text).
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- same treatmente0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- ? 15,676e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum net return was also recorded in the same treatment (? 15,676) with highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.32”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The same imidacloprid treatment gave the highest benefit:cost ratio, 1.32.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- same treatmente0
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.32e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum net return was also recorded in the same treatment (? 15,676) with highest benefit: cost ratio of 1.32”
t0“Indian mustard”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
application · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.