Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional Farm, Agricultural Research Station, S.K. Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Rajasthan during rainy (Kharif) season 2018 to identify effective weed control measures to manage weeds and increase yield of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum L.]. The experiment was laid out in randomised block design having 12 treatments with three replications. The pre-emergence application (PE) of atrazine 0.5 kg/ha was significantly superior in reducing weed density and biomass of both broad-leaved and grassy weeds. Weed free, atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE and post-emergence application (PoE) of 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha at 30 days after seeding (DAS), hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS and hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check. The maximum gross returns of ₹ 86360/ha was recorded under weed free treatment while highest B:C ratio was recorded with 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha PoE at 30 DAS (3.17), which was closely followed by atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE (3.16).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence atrazine significantly reduced broad-leaved and grassy weed density and biomass.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- atrazine 0.5 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- broad-leaved and grassy weedse0weed
- Outcome
- weed density and biomasse0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The pre-emergence application (PE) of atrazine 0.5 kg/ha was significantly superior in reducing weed density and biomass of both broad-leaved and grassy weeds.”
t0“pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum L.]”
t1“pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum L.]”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free management yielded 2.48 t/ha seed versus 1.31 t/ha under weedy check.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- Weed freee0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 2.48e0
- Qualifier
- 1.31 t/hae0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weed free, atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE and post-emergence application (PoE) of 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha at 30 days after seeding (DAS), hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS and hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check.”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine yielded 2.42 t/ha seed versus 1.31 t/ha under weedy check.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PEe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 2.42e0
- Qualifier
- 1.31 t/hae0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weed free, atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE and post-emergence application (PoE) of 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha at 30 days after seeding (DAS), hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS and hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check.”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence 2,4-D yielded 2.39 t/ha seed versus 1.31 t/ha under weedy check.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha at 30 days after seeding (DAS)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 2.39e0
- Qualifier
- 1.31 t/hae0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weed free, atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE and post-emergence application (PoE) of 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha at 30 days after seeding (DAS), hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS and hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check.”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand hoeing twice yielded 2.33 t/ha seed versus 1.31 t/ha under weedy check.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DASe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 2.33e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“hand hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS and hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check.”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand wheel hoeing twice yielded 2.28 t/ha seed versus 1.31 t/ha under weedy check.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DASe0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- as againste0
- Value
- 2.28e0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“hand wheel hoeing twice at 20 and 40 DAS registered 2.48, 2.42, 2.39, 2.33 and 2.28 t/ha seed yield, respectively as against 1.31 t/ha seed yield in weedy check.”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free treatment gave maximum gross returns of ₹ 86360/ha.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- weed free treatmente0
- Outcome
- maximum gross returnse0
- Value
- ₹ 86360/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The maximum gross returns of ₹ 86360/ha was recorded under weed free treatment”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergence 2,4-D had the highest B:C ratio of 3.17.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha PoE at 30 DASe0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Value
- 3.17e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest B:C ratio was recorded with 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha PoE at 30 DAS (3.17)”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine had a B:C ratio of 3.16.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PEe0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Value
- 3.16e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest B:C ratio was recorded with 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha PoE at 30 DAS (3.17), which was closely followed by atrazine 0.5 kg/ha PE (3.16)”
t0“pearl millet”
t1“pearl millet”
The same questions in other papers
2,4-D · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →atrazine · weed · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →atrazine · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →herbicide · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.