Paper · 1981 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Seedbed Preparation for Carrot Production on Organic Soil1

J. A. Millette; B. Vigier; E. J. Hogue

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Five sets of basic tillage operations were carried out for 5 consecutive years on an organic soil, each followed by seeding on the flat or on raised beds to determine the cultural methods that would provide the best yield of quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.) without adversely affecting the soil structure. Raised beds offered no yield advantage in a wet season and no yield reduction in a dry season. In a wet season, the bed system favored harvesting operations by reducing soil moisture and rendering the field surface firmer. Minimum tillage consisting of a fall and a spring disking did not reduce yields or increase soil bulk density as compared to spring plowing and rototilling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds gave no yield advantage over flat seeding in a wet season

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Raised bedse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no yield advantagee1
Comparator
on the flate2
Setting
a wet seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raised beds offered no yield advantage in a wet season and no yield reduction in a dry season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–424 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by seeding on the flat or on raised beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds gave no yield reduction compared with flat seeding in a dry season

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Raised bedse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no yield reductione1
Comparator
on the flate2
Setting
a dry seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Raised beds offered no yield advantage in a wet season and no yield reduction in a dry season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–424 · show in text ↑
e2

“followed by seeding on the flat or on raised beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bed system reduces soil moisture in a wet season

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
bed systeme3
Outcome
soil moisturee3
Direction
reducinge3
Setting
a wet seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e3

“In a wet season, the bed system favored harvesting operations by reducing soil moisture and rendering the field surface firmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bed system favours harvesting operations in a wet season

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
bed systeme3
Outcome
harvesting operationse3
Direction
favorede3
Setting
a wet seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e3

“In a wet season, the bed system favored harvesting operations by reducing soil moisture and rendering the field surface firmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bed system makes the field surface firmer in a wet season

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
bed systeme3
Outcome
field surfacee3
Direction
firmere3
Setting
a wet seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e3

“In a wet season, the bed system favored harvesting operations by reducing soil moisture and rendering the field surface firmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage does not reduce carrot yields compared with spring plowing and rototilling

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Minimum tillage consisting of a fall and a spring diskinge4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
did not reducee4
Comparator
spring plowing and rototillinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e4

“Minimum tillage consisting of a fall and a spring disking did not reduce yields or increase soil bulk density as compared to spring plowing and rototilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage does not increase soil bulk density compared with spring plowing and rototilling

Taxon
Daucus carotaDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Minimum tillage consisting of a fall and a spring diskinge4
Outcome
soil bulk densitye4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
spring plowing and rototillinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality fresh market carrots ( Daucus carota L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–282 · show in text ↑
e4

“Minimum tillage consisting of a fall and a spring disking did not reduce yields or increase soil bulk density as compared to spring plowing and rototilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–709 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.