Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Soil Organic Nitrogen Indirectly Enhances Pepper-Residue-Mediated Soil Disease Suppression through Manipulation of Soil Microbiome

Shan Hong; Hongling Jv; Xianfu Yuan; et al.

16
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Banana Fusarium wilt-suppressive soils are effective against pathogen invasion, yet soil physicochemical factors responsible for conducive or suppressive behavior have not been reported. Here, we investigated the changes in banana biomass, disease incidence (DI), soil culturable microbes and physicochemical properties by incorporating pepper and banana residues into conducive and suppressive soils. Before the incorporation of any residues, the suppressive soil significantly increased banana biomass and decreased DI compared to the conducive soil. The biomass of the suppressive soil was significantly higher than that of the conducive soil after the incorporation of either pepper or banana residues. Compared with the control (CK), the incorporation of pepper residues to both soils significantly reduced DI, while banana residues had the opposite effect. Additionally, both conducive and suppressive soils supplemented with pepper residues significantly reduced the amounts of culturable Fusarium oxysporum and increased the amounts of beneficial Pseudomonas and Bacillus. The pepper residue extracts significantly inhibited the growth of F. oxysporum mycelium. Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN) responded most strongly to residue application to suppressive soil. The AN factor was significantly and positively correlated with banana biomass; however, there was no direct and significant negative correlation with DI. Further analysis of the results showed that elevated AN content could stimulate the amounts of culturable Bacillus in the soil, and Bacillus antagonized the proliferation of pathogen and thus indirectly and effectively reduced banana DI. In conclusion, soil AN content can indirectly improve the disease suppression ability of pepper-residue-mediated suppressive soil by manipulating the soil microbiome.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Suppressive soil increased banana biomass relative to conducive soil before residue incorporation.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
banana biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conducive soile0
Setting
suppressive soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Before the incorporation of any residues, the suppressive soil significantly increased banana biomass and decreased DI compared to the conducive soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Suppressive soil decreased banana disease incidence relative to conducive soil before residue incorporation.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
DIe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
conducive soile0
Setting
suppressive soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Before the incorporation of any residues, the suppressive soil significantly increased banana biomass and decreased DI compared to the conducive soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With pepper residues, suppressive soil had higher banana biomass than conducive soil.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
peppere0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conducive soile0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of the suppressive soil was significantly higher than that of the conducive soil after the incorporation of either pepper or banana residues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“changes in banana biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With banana residues, suppressive soil had higher banana biomass than conducive soil.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
banana residuese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conducive soile0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of the suppressive soil was significantly higher than that of the conducive soil after the incorporation of either pepper or banana residues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper residues reduced banana disease incidence in both soil types relative to control.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
pepper residuese0
Outcome
DIe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control (CK)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control (CK), the incorporation of pepper residues to both soils significantly reduced DI, while banana residues had the opposite effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana residues increased banana disease incidence relative to control.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
banana residuese0
Outcome
DIe0
Comparator
control (CK)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control (CK), the incorporation of pepper residues to both soils significantly reduced DI, while banana residues had the opposite effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper residues reduced soil culturable Fusarium oxysporum in both soils.

Taxon
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0
Treatment
pepper residuese0
Outcome
amounts of culturable Fusarium oxysporume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · TaxonClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both conducive and suppressive soils supplemented with pepper residues significantly reduced the amounts of culturable Fusarium oxysporum and increased the amounts of beneficial Pseudomonas and Bacillus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper residues increased beneficial Pseudomonas in both soils.

Taxon
PseudomonasPseudomonase0
Treatment
pepper residuese0
Outcome
amounts of beneficial Pseudomonase0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both conducive and suppressive soils supplemented with pepper residues significantly reduced the amounts of culturable Fusarium oxysporum and increased the amounts of beneficial Pseudomonas and Bacillus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper residues increased beneficial Bacillus in both soils.

Taxon
Bacilluse0
Treatment
pepper residuese0
Outcome
amounts of beneficial Pseudomonas and Bacilluse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both conducive and suppressive soils supplemented with pepper residues significantly reduced the amounts of culturable Fusarium oxysporum and increased the amounts of beneficial Pseudomonas and Bacillus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper residue extracts inhibited Fusarium oxysporum mycelial growth.

Taxon
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0
Treatment
pepper residue extractse0
Outcome
growth of F. oxysporum myceliume0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · TaxonClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pepper residue extracts significantly inhibited the growth of F. oxysporum mycelium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen responded most strongly to residue application in suppressive soil.

Outcome
Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN)e0
Direction
most stronglye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN) responded most strongly to residue application to suppressive soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1276 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen correlated positively with banana biomass.

Taxon
bananae0
Compound
ANe0
Outcome
banana biomasse0
Direction
positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“The AN factor was significantly and positively correlated with banana biomass; however, there was no direct and significant negative correlation with DI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1430 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen had no significant direct negative correlation with banana disease incidence.

Taxon
bananae0
Compound
ANe0
Outcome
DIe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The AN factor was significantly and positively correlated with banana biomass; however, there was no direct and significant negative correlation with DI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1430 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated soil nitrogen could stimulate culturable Bacillus.

Taxon
Bacilluse0
Compound
ANe0
Outcome
amounts of culturable Bacilluse0
Direction
stimulatee0

Verbatim

e0

“elevated AN content could stimulate the amounts of culturable Bacillus in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1557 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus antagonized the pathogen and indirectly reduced banana disease incidence.

Taxon
bananae0
Interactor
Bacilluse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
banana DIe0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus antagonized the proliferation of pathogen and thus indirectly and effectively reduced banana DI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1668 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that soil nitrogen indirectly improves suppression by pepper residues through the soil microbiome.

Taxon
bananat0
Compound
ANe0
Outcome
disease suppression abilitye0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
by manipulating the soil microbiomee0

Verbatim

e0

“soil AN content can indirectly improve the disease suppression ability of pepper-residue-mediated suppressive soil by manipulating the soil microbiome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“changes in banana biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–238 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Fusarium oxysporumResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.