Paper · 2022 · Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research

Dissemination of Improved Production Techniques of Minor Millets Through Front Line Demonstrations for Productivity Enhancement in Theni, Madurai and Dindigul Districts of Southern Tamil Nadu

D. Thirusendura Selvi; S. Juliet Hepziba; S. Kanjana

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, minor millets becoming more popular than other cereals due to its inherent properties of adaptability to a range of marginal growing conditions, nutritious and withstanding severe biotic and abiotic stresses. However, underutilized and neglected in the cultivation part in several areas. It is also a known fact that the Theni, Madurai and Dindigul districts of southern Tamil Nadu has major population of scheduled caste (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST),”Paliyans”are living near the foothills of the Western Ghats, which is largely rural. These populations are really vulnerable communities which need better agricultural system for livelihood improvement and nutritional security. Attempts were made to popularize and adopt the high yielding variety and scientific methods of crop management practices in the farmers holdings of Theni district of Tamil Nadu through Front line demonstrations (FLDs) during 2016-19. The results exhibited that the average higher grain yield of 1559 kg/ha in barnyard millet and 1004 kg/ha in little millet were recorded in demonstration plots compared to 1250 kg/ha and 860 kg/ha respectively in farmers practice with a yield advantage of 24.7 and 16.7 per cent respectively. In summary, FLDs on village level were carried out by insisting worth of seed selection at farmers field and adoption of new variety under scientific methods of minor millet cultivation among the farming community for higher yield and income. Methods: The study was conducted in Western Ghats location of Theni, Madurai and Dindigul districts during 2016-19. The large-scale Frontline demonstrations were conducted in farmer’s field of selected villages of Aundipatti block of Theni district of Tamil Nadu during 2016-17 and 2017-18 in which need-based interventions were made on millet cultivation among the farmers who comes under SC/ST category of under privileged section. Result: The results of the Frontline demonstration confirmed that TNAU Barnyard millet varieties CO (Kv) 2 and MDU 1 and little millet variety CO (Sa) 4 with improved cultivation practices were found better than the local check at farmer’s field. Yield of the frontline demonstration trials and potential yield of the crop variety was compared to estimate the yield gap. Thus, the demonstration improved the skill of the farmer as well as the interest of adoption of new variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barnyard millet demonstration plots yielded 1559 kg/ha versus 1250 kg/ha in farmer practice, a 24.7 per cent advantage.

Taxon
barnyard millete0
Treatment
demonstration plotse1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1559 kg/hae0
Qualifier
yield advantage of 24.7 and 16.7 per cent respectivelye1
Comparator
farmers practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“average higher grain yield of 1559 kg/ha in barnyard millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded in demonstration plots compared to 1250 kg/ha and 860 kg/ha respectively in farmers practice with a yield advantage of 24.7 and 16.7 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little millet demonstration plots yielded 1004 kg/ha versus 860 kg/ha in farmer practice, a 16.7 per cent advantage.

Taxon
little millete0
Treatment
demonstration plotse1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
1004 kg/hae0
Comparator
farmers practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“1004 kg/ha in little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded in demonstration plots compared to 1250 kg/ha and 860 kg/ha respectively in farmers practice with a yield advantage of 24.7 and 16.7 per cent respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1229 · show in text ↑
e2

“average higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNAU barnyard millet varieties CO (Kv) 2 and MDU 1 with improved practices performed better than the local check.

Taxon
Barnyard millete0
Material
CO (Kv) 2 and MDU 1e0
Treatment
improved cultivation practicese0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
local checke0

Verbatim

e0

“TNAU Barnyard millet varieties CO (Kv) 2 and MDU 1 and little millet variety CO (Sa) 4 with improved cultivation practices were found better than the local check at farmer’s field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little millet variety CO (Sa) 4 with improved practices performed better than the local check.

Taxon
little millete0
Material
CO (Sa) 4e0
Treatment
improved cultivation practicese0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
local checke0

Verbatim

e0

“little millet variety CO (Sa) 4 with improved cultivation practices were found better than the local check at farmer’s field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstration improved farmer skill and interest in adopting a new variety.

Taxon
minor milletse1
Outcome
skill of the farmer as well as the interest of adoption of new varietye0
Direction
improvede0

Verbatim

e0

“the demonstration improved the skill of the farmer as well as the interest of adoption of new variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2285–2386 · show in text ↑
e1

“minor millets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–35 · show in text ↑