Paper · 2022 · Soil Systems

Optimum Rate and Deep Placement of Nitrogen Fertilizer Improves Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Tomato Yield in Nepal

Naba Raj Pandit; Dyutiman Choudhary; Shashish Maharjan; et al.

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Nepal, blanket fertilizer recommendations without considering diverse soil types, nutrient status, climate and crop management practices along with imbalanced fertilization practices by farmers, mainly “urea fertilizer,” have resulted in reduced nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and productivity in tomato production. Optimizing the rate of nitrogen (N) fertilizer, application time and improved application methods could increase crop yields and NUE and reduce environmental costs. This study was conducted to identify the optimum N rate and application method for increased tomato yield and NUE. Multilocation trials (n = 28) conducted in a randomized complete block design with nine treatments across five districts included the omission of N, P and K (N0, P0, K0), variable N rates of 100, 150, 200 and 250 kg ha−1 (N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250), use of urea briquettes (UB) with deep placement (UBN-150) and a control (CK). N input in UB was reduced by 25% from the recommended N rate of 200 kg ha−1 considering its expected higher NUE. Yield responses from an NPK omission plot revealed N as the most limiting plant nutrient. Applications of fertilizer at N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250 increased tomato yield by 27%, 35%, 43% and 27%, respectively, over N0. Tomato yields responded quadratically to the added N fertilizers with optimum rates ranging from 150 to 200 kg ha−1 across districts. UBN-150 significantly increased tomato yield by 12% over N-150 and produced a similar yield to N-200 (the recommended rate). The highest partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) was observed at N-100 and the highest agronomic efficiency of N (AEN) was at N-200. Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 27% and 21% compared with N-150 and N-200, respectively. These results have positive implications for developing efficient N fertilization strategies to increase tomato yields and reduce environmental impacts in Nepal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen was the most limiting plant nutrient in omission plots.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
N as the most limiting plant nutriente0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield responses from an NPK omission plot revealed N as the most limiting plant nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-100 increased tomato yield by 27% over N0.

Treatment
N-100e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of fertilizer at N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250 increased tomato yield by 27%, 35%, 43% and 27%, respectively, over N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-150 increased tomato yield by 35% over N0.

Treatment
N-150e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of fertilizer at N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250 increased tomato yield by 27%, 35%, 43% and 27%, respectively, over N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-200 increased tomato yield by 43% over N0.

Treatment
N-200e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of fertilizer at N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250 increased tomato yield by 27%, 35%, 43% and 27%, respectively, over N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-250 increased tomato yield by 27% over N0.

Treatment
N-250e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of fertilizer at N-100, N-150, N-200 and N-250 increased tomato yield by 27%, 35%, 43% and 27%, respectively, over N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield responded quadratically to nitrogen, with optima of 150 to 200 kg ha−1 across districts.

Treatment
added N fertilizerse0
Outcome
Tomato yieldse0
Value
150 to 200 kg ha−1e0
Setting
districtse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato yields responded quadratically to the added N fertilizers with optimum rates ranging from 150 to 200 kg ha−1 across districts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UBN-150 increased tomato yield by 12% over N-150.

Treatment
UBN-150e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
N-150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UBN-150 significantly increased tomato yield by 12% over N-150”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UBN-150 produced a similar tomato yield to N-200.

Treatment
UBN-150e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
N-200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UBN-150 significantly increased tomato yield by 12% over N-150 and produced a similar yield to N-200”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-100 had the highest PFPN.

Treatment
N-100e0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) was observed at N-100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-200 had the highest AEN.

Treatment
N-200e0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of N (AEN)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest agronomic efficiency of N (AEN) was at N-200”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% compared with N-150.

Treatment
Deep placement of UB at-150e0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
N-150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 27% and 21% compared with N-150 and N-200, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 21% compared with N-200.

Treatment
Deep placement of UB at-150e0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
N-200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 27% and 21% compared with N-150 and N-200, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of UB at-150 increased AEN by 27% compared with N-150.

Treatment
Deep placement of UB at-150e0
Outcome
AENe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
N-150e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 27% and 21% compared with N-150 and N-200, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of UB at-150 increased AEN by 21% compared with N-200.

Treatment
Deep placement of UB at-150e0
Outcome
AENe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
N-200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep placement of UB at-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 27% and 21% compared with N-150 and N-200, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 172 positive, 38 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.