Abstract
Studies on the management of peanut crops in the semiarid region of Minas Gerais are scarce. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the agronomic performance of four peanut cultivars under different irrigation systems and row spacing in northern Minas Gerais. The cultivars IAC 503, Runner IAC 886, IAC Tatu ST, and Crioula were grown at row spacing of 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 m and irrigated or not irrigated. The following variables were evaluated: Total number of pods, number of commercial pods, number of seeds, mass of one hundred grains, grain yield index, oil content, pod yield, grain yield and oil yield. After analysis of variance, the average values were compared using the Scott-Knott method with a probability of 5%. The spacing of 0.5 m promoted higher productivity in pods, grains, and oil in both systems. Under irrigation, IAC 503 and IAC 886 were the most productive, while the cultivars did not differ under non-irrigated cultivation. Finally, irrigation resulted in an increase in grain yield of up to 50% compared to non-irrigated cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
A 0.5 m spacing gave higher pod productivity in both irrigation systems.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- spacing of 0.5 me0
- Outcome
- productivity in podse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in both systemse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spacing of 0.5 m promoted higher productivity in pods, grains, and oil in both systems”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
A 0.5 m spacing gave higher grain productivity in both irrigation systems.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- spacing of 0.5 me0
- Outcome
- productivity in pods, grainse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in both systemse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spacing of 0.5 m promoted higher productivity in pods, grains, and oil in both systems”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
A 0.5 m spacing gave higher oil productivity in both irrigation systems.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- spacing of 0.5 me0
- Outcome
- productivity in pods, grains, and oile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in both systemse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The spacing of 0.5 m promoted higher productivity in pods, grains, and oil in both systems”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Under irrigation, IAC 503 and IAC 886 were the most productive cultivars.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- IAC 503 and IAC 886e0
- Outcome
- most productivee0
- Direction
- most productivee0
- Qualifier
- Under irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under irrigation, IAC 503 and IAC 886 were the most productive”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars did not differ under non-irrigated cultivation.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- cultivars did not differe0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Qualifier
- under non-irrigated cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the cultivars did not differ under non-irrigated cultivation”
t0“peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased grain yield by up to 50% relative to non-irrigated cultivation.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- up to 50%e0
- Comparator
- non-irrigated cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation resulted in an increase in grain yield of up to 50% compared to non-irrigated cultivation”
t0“peanut”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
187 papers more in this group
See all 191 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.