Paper · 2022 · Forest Pathology

Resistance to quambalaria shoot blight and myrtle rust in Corymbia calophylla seedlings

Hoa T. Duong; Geoff S. Pegg; Richard Mazanec; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Corymbia calophylla (marri), an endemic keystone tree species in southwest Western Australia, is increasingly impacted by the introduced basidiomycete smut Quambalaria pitereka . The basidiomycete rust Austropuccinia psidii (myrtle rust), an invasive pathogen recently introduced to Eastern Australia, is expected to spread to the southwest of Western Australia eventually. Austropuccinia psidii has similar epidemiology to Q . pitereka, and there is concern that C . calophylla may be susceptible. Preliminary pathogenicity tests showed significant differences in aggressiveness between twelve Q . pitereka isolates, and there was evidence of interactions between isolates and C . calophylla provenances. Seedlings from 59 open‐pollinated families from 11 provenances covering the natural range of marri were screened for resistance to Q . pitereka and A . psidii under controlled glasshouse conditions. Resistance of seedlings within provenances to Q . pitereka and A . psidii differed significantly. There was no significant correlation between resistance to Q . pitereka and resistance to A . psidii . Seedlings of provenances from wetter regions were more resistant to both pathogens, but the correlation coefficients were insignificant. Seedlings of four families in three provenances (Serpentine, Chidlow, and Kingston) showed 100% resistance to Q . pitereka . Narrow‐sense heritability estimates were 0.07 for quambalaria shoot blight resistance and 0.34 for myrtle rust resistance. The results indicate the potential to use selected families/individuals resistant to Q . pitereka and A . psidii for tree improvement programs and adaptive management strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Q. pitereka isolates differed significantly in aggressiveness.

Outcome
aggressivenesse0
Direction
differencese0
Value
twelvee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences in aggressiveness between twelve Q . pitereka isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen isolates interacted with Corymbia provenance.

Taxon
C . calophyllaCorymbia calophyllae0
Material
provenancese0
Outcome
interactions between isolates and C . calophylla provenancese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Corymbia calophylla
Corymbia calophylla · TaxonCas Liber · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evidence of interactions between isolates and C . calophylla provenances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–713 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling resistance to Q. pitereka differed among provenances.

Interactor
Q . piterekaQuambalaria piterekae0pathogen
Outcome
Resistance of seedlings within provenances to Q . piterekae0
Direction
differede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance of seedlings within provenances to Q . pitereka and A . psidii differed significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling resistance to A. psidii differed among provenances.

Interactor
A . psidiiAustropuccinia psidiie0pathogen
Outcome
Resistance of seedlings within provenances to Q . pitereka and A . psidiie0
Direction
differede0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austropuccinia psidii
Austropuccinia psidii · InteractorJohn Tann from Mullumbimby, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance of seedlings within provenances to Q . pitereka and A . psidii differed significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1010 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance to the two pathogens was not significantly correlated.

Interactor
Q . piterekaQuambalaria piterekae0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Q . piterekae0
Direction
no significant correlatione0
Qualifier
resistance to A . psidiie0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“no significant correlation between resistance to Q . pitereka and resistance to A . psidii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings from wetter provenances tended toward greater resistance to both pathogens, without significant correlations.

Outcome
resistant to both pathogense0
Direction
more resistante0
Setting
wetter regionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of provenances from wetter regions were more resistant to both pathogens, but the correlation coefficients were insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four families from three provenances showed complete Q. pitereka resistance.

Material
four familiese0
Interactor
Q . piterekaQuambalaria piterekae0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Q . piterekae0
Value
100%e0
Setting
Serpentine, Chidlow, and Kingstone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of four families in three provenances (Serpentine, Chidlow, and Kingston) showed 100% resistance to Q . pitereka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1374 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow-sense heritability of quambalaria shoot blight resistance was 0.07.

Outcome
quambalaria shoot blight resistancee0
Value
0.07e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow‐sense heritability estimates were 0.07 for quambalaria shoot blight resistance and 0.34 for myrtle rust resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow-sense heritability of myrtle rust resistance was 0.34.

Outcome
myrtle rust resistancee0
Value
0.34e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow‐sense heritability estimates were 0.07 for quambalaria shoot blight resistance and 0.34 for myrtle rust resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1498 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose resistant families or individuals for tree improvement and adaptive management.

Outcome
use selected families/individuals resistant to Q . pitereka and A . psidii for tree improvement programs and adaptive management strategiese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“potential to use selected families/individuals resistant to Q . pitereka and A . psidii for tree improvement programs and adaptive management strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1677 · show in text ↑