Paper · 2022 · Microorganisms

Seasonal Effect on Bacterial Communities Associated with the Rhizospheres of Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella Species in the Cape Fynbos, South Africa

Tiisetso Mpai; Sanjay K. Jaiswal; Christopher N. Cupido; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Cape fynbos biome in South Africa is home to highly diverse and endemic shrub legumes, which include species of Aspalathus, Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella. These species play a significant role in improving soil fertility due to their ability to fix N2. However, information regarding their microbiome is still unknown. Using the 16S rRNA Miseq illumina sequencing, this study assessed the bacterial community structure associated with the rhizospheres of Polhillia pallens, Polhillia brevicalyx, Wiborgia obcordata, Wiborgia sericea and Wiborgiella sessilifolia growing at different locations during the wet and dry seasons in the Cape fynbos. The results showed that the most dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteria during both the dry (56.2–37.2%) and wet (46.3–33.3%) seasons. Unclassified bacterial genera (19.9–27.7%) were the largest inhabitants in the rhizospheres of all five species during the two seasons. The other dominant phyla included Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Mycobacterium and Conexibacter genera were the biggest populations found in the rhizosphere soil of all five test species during both seasons, except for W. obcordata soil sampled during the dry season, which had Dehalogenimonas as the major inhabitant (6.08%). In this study plant species and growth season were the major drivers of microbial community structure, with W. obcordata having the greatest influence on its microbiome than the other test species. The wet season promoted greater microbial diversity than the dry season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria was the dominant rhizosphere phylum in both seasons.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Interactor
ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae0symbiont
Outcome
dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteriae0
Value
56.2–37.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteria during both the dry (56.2–37.2%) and wet (46.3–33.3%) seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unclassified bacterial genera were the largest rhizosphere inhabitants across all five species and both seasons.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Interactor
Unclassified bacterial generae0symbiont
Outcome
largest inhabitants in the rhizospherese0
Value
19.9–27.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unclassified bacterial genera (19.9–27.7%) were the largest inhabitants in the rhizospheres of all five species during the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Proteobacteria were also dominant phyla.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Outcome
dominant phyla included Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteriae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other dominant phyla included Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmicutes was also a dominant phylum.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Interactor
FirmicutesBacillotae0symbiont
Outcome
Firmicutese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other dominant phyla included Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycobacterium and Conexibacter were the largest genera in rhizosphere soil across species and seasons, apart from one exception.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Interactor
MycobacteriumMycobacteriume0symbiont
Second interactor
ConexibacterConexibactere0symbiont
Outcome
biggest populations found in the rhizosphere soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mycobacterium
Mycobacterium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycobacterium and Conexibacter genera were the biggest populations found in the rhizosphere soil of all five test species during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehalogenimonas was the major inhabitant of W. obcordata rhizosphere soil in the dry season at 6.08%.

Taxon
W. obcordataWiborgia obcordatae0
Interactor
DehalogenimonasDehalogenimonase0symbiont
Outcome
Dehalogenimonas as the major inhabitante0
Value
6.08%e0
Qualifier
dry seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Wiborgia obcordata
Wiborgia obcordata · TaxonNoeleen du Toit · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dehalogenimonas
Dehalogenimonas · InteractorTrent A. Key, Dray P. Richmond, Kimberly S. Bowman, Yong-Joon Cho, Jongsik Chun, Milton S. da Costa, Fred A. Rainey & William M. Moe · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W. obcordata soil sampled during the dry season, which had Dehalogenimonas as the major inhabitant (6.08%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1286 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant species and growth season were major drivers of microbial community structure.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Outcome
microbial community structuree0
Qualifier
plant species and growth seasone0
Setting
growth seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant species and growth season were the major drivers of microbial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. obcordata had the greatest influence on its microbiome among tested species.

Taxon
W. obcordataWiborgia obcordatae0
Outcome
influence on its microbiomee0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
other test speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Wiborgia obcordata
Wiborgia obcordata · TaxonNoeleen du Toit · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W. obcordata having the greatest influence on its microbiome than the other test species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1484 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet season had greater microbial diversity than dry season.

Taxon
Polhillia, Wiborgia and WiborgiellaPolhilliaWiborgiaWiborgiellat0
Outcome
microbial diversitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
dry seasone0
Setting
wet seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Polhillia
Polhillia · TaxonBrian du Preez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Wiborgiella
Wiborgiella · TaxonCharles Stirton · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wet season promoted greater microbial diversity than the dry season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–112 · show in text ↑