Paper · 2022 · Remote Sensing

Early Monitoring of Cotton Verticillium Wilt by Leaf Multiple “Symptom” Characteristics

Mi Yang; Changping Huang; Xiaoyan Kang; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Early diagnosis of cotton verticillium wilt (VW) and accurate assessment of the disease degree are important prerequisites for preventing the large-scale development of cotton VW. Hyperspectral techniques have been widely used for monitoring the extent of plant diseases, but early detection of VW disease in cotton remains a challenge. In this study, the Boruta algorithm was used to select the key physiological characteristics (leaf temperature, chlorophyll a content, and equivalent water thickness) of cotton leaves at the early stage of VW disease, and then the Relief-F algorithm was used to select the spectral features indicating multiple “symptoms” of cotton VW disease at the early stage. In addition, a new cotton VW early monitoring indicator (CVWEI) was constructed by combining the weights of the new index and related bands using a hierarchical analysis (AHP) and entropy weighting method (EWM). The study showed that the physiological indices constructed under VW stress were better indicators of VW disease than traditional vegetation indices; CVEWI achieved a high accuracy of 95% in the test set, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.89; and the test set R2 was 0.73 and RMSE was 3.15% for monitoring disease severity, compared to the optimal classification constructed using a single spectral index. The results may provide new ideas and methods for early and accurate monitoring of VW and other fungal diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological indices constructed under VW stress were better indicators of VW disease than traditional vegetation indices.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome
indicators of VW diseasee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
traditional vegetation indicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Verticillium Wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“the physiological indices constructed under VW stress were better indicators of VW disease than traditional vegetation indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1060 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CVEWI index achieved 95% accuracy in the test set.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome
accuracye2
Value
95%e2
Qualifier
in the test sete2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Verticillium Wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“CVEWI achieved a high accuracy of 95% in the test set, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1149 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CVEWI index achieved a Kappa coefficient of 0.89.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome
Kappa coefficiente2
Value
0.89e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Verticillium Wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“CVEWI achieved a high accuracy of 95% in the test set, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1149 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the test set, the R2 for monitoring disease severity was 0.73, compared with the optimal single-index classification.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome
test set R2e3
Value
0.73e3
Comparator
optimal classification constructed using a single spectral indexe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Verticillium Wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“the test set R2 was 0.73 and RMSE was 3.15% for monitoring disease severity, compared to the optimal classification constructed using a single spectral index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1312 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the test set, the RMSE for monitoring disease severity was 3.15%, compared with the optimal single-index classification.

Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome
RMSEe3
Value
3.15%e3
Qualifier
for monitoring disease severitye3
Comparator
optimal classification constructed using a single spectral indexe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Verticillium Wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“the test set R2 was 0.73 and RMSE was 3.15% for monitoring disease severity, compared to the optimal classification constructed using a single spectral index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1312 · show in text ↑