Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Does Belt Uniform Sowing Improve Winter Wheat Yield under High Sowing Density?

Mei Chen; Yong-He Zhu; Ming-Jian Ren; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The belt uniform (BU) sowing pattern can improve the yield of winter wheat, but whether and how the BU sowing pattern can increase yield under different sowing densities is unknown. The field study was conducted in Guiyang (Guizhou province) during the growing season in 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020. Four winter wheat cultivars were used in field experiments to investigate the changes of the dry matter accumulation and partition, yield and yield components at maturity under five sowing densities (75, 150, 225, 300, and 375 plants per m2), and three sowing patterns: line and dense (LD) sowing with 33.3 cm row spacing (LDS); the belt uniform (BU) sowing with 15 cm (BUN), and 20 cm (BUW) row spacing. The BU sowing pattern significantly increases shoot dry matter and grain yield in all four winter wheat cultivars under all five sowing densities and in each growing season, particularly under the high sowing density of 300 and 375 plants m−2. Harvest index was unaffected by the different sowing densities and sowing patterns. While spike number increased, grain weight per spike decreased with the increase in sowing density. The 1000-grain weight and grain number per spike were unaffected by the sowing patterns. The variation in the shoot dry weight can explain 94% variation in grain yield and 66% variation in spike number. Allometric analysis showed that more dry matter was partitioned to the spike than to the stem and leaf. We conclude that the BU sowing pattern can increase grain yield under high sowing densities associated with a high shoot dry matter accumulation and its partition to the spike.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BU sowing increased shoot dry matter across cultivars, densities and seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BU sowing patterne0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
all four winter wheat cultivars under all five sowing densities and in each growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BU sowing pattern significantly increases shoot dry matter and grain yield in all four winter wheat cultivars under all five sowing densities and in each growing season, particularly under the high sowing density of 300 and 375 plants m−2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BU sowing increased grain yield across cultivars, densities and seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
BU sowing patterne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
300 and 375 plants m−2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BU sowing pattern significantly increases shoot dry matter and grain yield in all four winter wheat cultivars under all five sowing densities and in each growing season, particularly under the high sowing density of 300 and 375 plants m−2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was unaffected by density and sowing pattern.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different sowing densities and sowing patternse0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was unaffected by the different sowing densities and sowing patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike number increased with sowing density.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in sowing densitye0
Outcome
spike numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While spike number increased, grain weight per spike decreased with the increase in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight per spike decreased as density rose.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increase in sowing densitye0
Outcome
grain weight per spikee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While spike number increased, grain weight per spike decreased with the increase in sowing density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing pattern did not affect 1000-grain weight or grain number per spike.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sowing patternse0
Outcome
1000-grain weight and grain number per spikee0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000-grain weight and grain number per spike were unaffected by the sowing patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight explained 94% of grain yield variation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
variation in grain yielde0
Value
94%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in the shoot dry weight can explain 94% variation in grain yield and 66% variation in spike number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight explained 66% of spike number variation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
variation in spike numbere0
Value
66%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in the shoot dry weight can explain 94% variation in grain yield and 66% variation in spike number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More dry matter partitioned to spikes than stems and leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
spikee0
Outcome
dry matter was partitionede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
stem and leafe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Allometric analysis showed that more dry matter was partitioned to the spike than to the stem and leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.