Paper · 2015 · International Letters of Natural Sciences

Response of Elite Kenyan Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana, L. Gaertn) Genotypes to Ethrel Application

Josephine Sarah Kunguni; Damaris A. Odeny; Otto G. Dangasuk; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Finger millet is a staple food crop of many communities in Africa. The crop is highly nutritious and has incredible grain storage quality. Limited research investment in finger millet in the past has resulted in poor yields and there are currently no commercial hybrids. We investigated the response of different finger millet genotypes (Okhale-1, Gulu-E, KACCIMMI-72, IE 2872, IE 4115 and U-15) to the application of a plant growth regulator hormone (Ethrel). Six elite Kenyan finger millet varieties with contrasting agronomic traits were crossed in a 6 x 6 diallel pattern. To enhance male sterility across female parents, we subjected the plants to Ethrel at concentrations of 1,500ppm, 1,750ppm and 2,000ppm against a 0ppm check. Dwarfing of sprayed plants that resulted in less lodging and ultimately higher yields were observed among plants sprayed with Ethrel at different concentrations. Ethrel application at 2,000ppm had the most dwarfing effect on plants while spraying plants with 1,500ppm of Ethrel resulted in increased grain weight. Although our results demonstrate overall positive effect of Ethrel on finger millet production, the optimum concentrations for more efficient hybridization will still need to be determined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel sprayed plants were dwarfed.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Ethrel at different concentrationse0
Outcome
Dwarfinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dwarfing of sprayed plants that resulted in less lodging and ultimately higher yields were observed among plants sprayed with Ethrel at different concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel sprayed plants had less lodging.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Ethrel at different concentrationse0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dwarfing of sprayed plants that resulted in less lodging and ultimately higher yields were observed among plants sprayed with Ethrel at different concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel sprayed plants had higher yields.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Ethrel at different concentrationse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dwarfing of sprayed plants that resulted in less lodging and ultimately higher yields were observed among plants sprayed with Ethrel at different concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 2,000ppm produced the greatest dwarfing.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Ethrel application at 2,000ppme0
Outcome
dwarfing effecte0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethrel application at 2,000ppm had the most dwarfing effect on plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 1,500ppm increased grain weight.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
1,500ppm of Ethrele0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying plants with 1,500ppm of Ethrel resulted in increased grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.