Paper · 2021 · Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research

Geographic and Within Tree Variation for Wood Properties in Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Wight and Arn. Populations

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The study was conducted to compare the wood parameters among nine populations of Acrocarpus fraxinifolius from Southern Karnataka. To understand the variation, three trees from each population were selected and different wood properties, viz., bark-thickness, wood density, specific gravity, fibre parameters and vessel parameters , were analysed. The basic wood density of species was ranged between 0.370 g∙cc −1 to 0.580 g∙cc −1 . There was a significant difference in fibre length across the populations, with an average fibre length of 1225.49 µm. There was not much difference in fibre width, fibre lumen width and fibre wall thickness. Vessel parameters, except vessel wall thickness varied among the populations. The vessel length varied from 104.78 μm to 124.71 μm. The wood traits varied among the radial portion i.e., from pith to periphery region. Considering the important wood traits, Shreemangala and Balehonnuru populations were found to be better compared to other populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basic wood density ranged from 0.370 to 0.580 g per cubic centimeter.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Outcome
basic wood densitye0
Value
0.370 g∙cc −1 to 0.580 g∙cc −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The basic wood density of species was ranged between 0.370 g∙cc −1 to 0.580 g∙cc −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre length differed significantly among populations and averaged 1225.49 µm.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Outcome
fibre lengthe0
Value
1225.49 µme0
Setting
populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was a significant difference in fibre length across the populations, with an average fibre length of 1225.49 µm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre width, lumen width and wall thickness differed little among populations.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Outcome
fibre width, fibre lumen width and fibre wall thicknesse0
Direction
not much differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was not much difference in fibre width, fibre lumen width and fibre wall thickness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vessel parameters other than wall thickness varied among populations.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Outcome
Vessel parameters, except vessel wall thicknesse0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vessel parameters, except vessel wall thickness varied among the populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–720 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vessel length ranged from 104.78 to 124.71 μm.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Outcome
vessel lengthe0
Direction
variede0
Value
104.78 μm to 124.71 μme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The vessel length varied from 104.78 μm to 124.71 μm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wood traits varied radially from pith to periphery.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Organ / stage
from pith to periphery regione0
Outcome
wood traitse0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wood traits varied among the radial portion i.e., from pith to periphery region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–859 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shreemangala and Balehonnuru populations had better important wood traits than other populations.

Taxon
Acrocarpus fraxinifoliusAcrocarpus fraxinifoliust0
Material
Shreemangala and Balehonnuru populationse0
Outcome
important wood traitse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius · TaxonTrees ForTheFuture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Acrocarpus fraxinifolius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Considering the important wood traits, Shreemangala and Balehonnuru populations were found to be better compared to other populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–994 · show in text ↑