Paper · 2022 · Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology

Environmental conditions and bee foraging on watermelon crops in Panama

Juan Carlos Di Trani; Virginia Meléndez Ramírez; Yostin Añino; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Watermelon is a crop highly dependent on bees for pollination, and environmental conditions are some of the most important factors affecting bee foraging. In this study, we analyze the effect of environmental conditions on the behavior of the most common bees visiting flowers of watermelon crops in Panama. We recorded the number of visits, visit duration, and the corresponding environmental conditions during the visits. Environmental conditions affected the observed groups of bees differently: honey bee visit proportion was remarkably higher at low temperatures, solar radiation, wind speed, and high relative humidity, early in the morning when they made about 90% of their flower visits. The other observed bees showed a more homogenous behavior during the day, with peaks representing about 25-35% of the daily visits. Visit number showed a correlation with temperature for all the most common bees except Augochloropsis spp., with solar radiation for A. mellifera and Lasioglossum spp., with humidity for all except Lasioglossum spp., and with wind speed for all of the analyzed bees. Visit durations were remarkably longer in N. perilampoides early on the day. At the same time, the rest of the bees showed less pronounced duration peaks, reaching their maximum at intermediate values of environmental conditions. Visit duration on honeybees did not correlate with environmental factors, but it did for most other bees. Environmental conditions showed a strong effect on the bee foraging behavior, with each group of bees concentrating their activities in favorable conditions depending on their biology, establishing their daily foraging patterns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey bee visitation was concentrated early in the morning under low temperature, radiation and wind, and high humidity, accounting for about 90% of visits.

Taxon
honey beeApis melliferae0
Outcome
visit proportione0
Direction
highere0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
low temperatures, solar radiation, wind speed, and high relative humiditye0
Setting
early in the morninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“honey bee visit proportion was remarkably higher at low temperatures, solar radiation, wind speed, and high relative humidity, early in the morning when they made about 90% of their flower visits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other observed bees had more uniform daily visitation, with peaks of about 25–35% of daily visits.

Taxon
other observed beese0
Outcome
daily visitse0
Direction
peakse0
Value
25-35%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The other observed bees showed a more homogenous behavior during the day, with peaks representing about 25-35% of the daily visits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–827 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit number correlated with temperature for common bees other than Augochloropsis spp.

Taxon
most common beese0
Outcome
Visit numbere0
Qualifier
except Augochloropsis spp.e0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Visit number showed a correlation with temperature for all the most common bees except Augochloropsis spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–934 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit number correlated with solar radiation for A. mellifera.

Taxon
A. melliferae0
Outcome
solar radiatione0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“with solar radiation for A. mellifera and Lasioglossum spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–995 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit number correlated with solar radiation for Lasioglossum spp.

Taxon
Lasioglossum spp.Lasioglossume0
Outcome
solar radiatione0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lasioglossum
Lasioglossum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Adrian Tync · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with solar radiation for A. mellifera and Lasioglossum spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–995 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit number correlated with humidity for common bees other than Lasioglossum spp.

Taxon
alle0
Outcome
humiditye0
Qualifier
except Lasioglossum spp.e0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“with humidity for all except Lasioglossum spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1043 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit number correlated with wind speed for all analyzed bees.

Taxon
analyzed beese0
Outcome
wind speede0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“with wind speed for all of the analyzed bees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1093 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. perilampoides visits lasted longer early in the day.

Taxon
N. perilampoidese0
Outcome
Visit durationse0
Direction
longere0
Setting
early on the daye0

Verbatim

e0

“Visit durations were remarkably longer in N. perilampoides early on the day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other bees had less pronounced duration peaks, maximal at intermediate environmental conditions.

Taxon
rest of the beese0
Outcome
duration peakse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
intermediate values of environmental conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“the rest of the bees showed less pronounced duration peaks, reaching their maximum at intermediate values of environmental conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1324 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honeybee visit duration did not correlate with environmental factors.

Taxon
honeybeesApis melliferae0
Outcome
Visit duratione0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apis mellifera
Apis mellifera · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visit duration on honeybees did not correlate with environmental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1397 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visit duration correlated with environmental factors for most other bees.

Taxon
other beese0
Outcome
ite0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but it did for most other bees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1430 · show in text ↑