Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’ with both conventional vine planting (CVP) and tuber seedling transplanting (TST) to estimate yield properties under large ridge (LAR) cultivation with two rows in a ridge and compared with the conventional high ridge (CHR) cultivation method. The LAR shapes were LAR1 (ridge height [RH], 35 cm; ridge distance [RID], 180 cm; ridge bed width [RBW], 120 cm; ridge shoulder width [RSW], 90 cm; and furrow, 60 cm) and LAR2 (RH, 35 cm; RID, 160 cm; RBW, 100 cm; RSW, 70 cm; and furrow, 60 cm) in 2008, and LAR3 (RH, 35 cm; RID, 160 cm; RBW, 110 cm; RSW, 80 cm; and furrow, 50 cm) in 2009. In 2008, the LAR1 and LAR2 cultivations were not superior in root tuber yield to the CHR cultivation. In 2009, we investigated the yield properties by including the planting density factor (2.222, 1.852, and 1.500 hills m-2) within the ridge cultivation modes (CHR/LAR3) and planting modes (CVP/TST). The lowest root tuber yield was obtained in the LAR3×CVP×1.852 treatment (3784 g m-2). With respect to the two-factor interaction between ridge modes (CHR/LAR3) and planting modes (CVP/TST), the lowest yield was obtained in the LAR3×CVP treatment (4079 g m-2), and under LAR3 conditions, the yield was higher under TST (5169 g m-2) than under CVP at the 1% level. These results suggested that the TST method might be suitable, while the CVP method would be unsuitable, for the LAR3 cultivation. The results obtained in this study could be useful for future studies on ridge shape for sweet potato cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
In 2008, large-ridge LAR1 and LAR2 were not superior in root tuber yield to conventional high ridge cultivation.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatase0 - Material
- Murasakimasarie0
- Treatment
- LAR1 and LAR2 cultivationse1
- Outcome
- root tuber yielde1
- Direction
- not superiore1
- Comparator
- CHR cultivatione1
- Setting
- field experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’”
e1“In 2008, the LAR1 and LAR2 cultivations were not superior in root tuber yield to the CHR cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
The LAR3×CVP×1.852 treatment gave the lowest root tuber yield, 3784 g m-2.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
- Material
- Murasakimasarie0
- Treatment
- LAR3×CVP×1.852 treatmente2
- Outcome
- root tuber yielde2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 3784 g m-2e2
- Setting
- field experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’”
e2“The lowest root tuber yield was obtained in the LAR3×CVP×1.852 treatment (3784 g m-2)”
Claim · model-written summary
The LAR3×CVP treatment gave the lowest yield, 4079 g m-2, for the ridge-by-planting-mode interaction.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
- Material
- Murasakimasarie0
- Treatment
- LAR3×CVPe3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 4079 g m-2e3
- Setting
- field experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’”
e3“the lowest yield was obtained in the LAR3×CVP treatment (4079 g m-2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Under LAR3 conditions, tuber seedling transplanting (TST) gave higher yield than conventional vine planting (CVP), 5169 g m-2, at the 1% level.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
- Material
- Murasakimasarie0
- Treatment
- TSTe4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 5169 g m-2e4
- Qualifier
- under LAR3 conditionse4
- Comparator
- CVPe4
- Setting
- field experimentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’”
e4“under LAR3 conditions, the yield was higher under TST (5169 g m-2) than under CVP at the 1% level”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest TST might be suitable and CVP unsuitable for LAR3 cultivation.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
- Outcome
- TST method might be suitablee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted using the sweet potato cultivar ‘Murasakimasari’”
e5“These results suggested that the TST method might be suitable, while the CVP method would be unsuitable, for the LAR3 cultivation”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.