Paper · 2022 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Efficiency of Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population

E Taha; A El-Hoary; S Sedhom; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out at the Etay El-Baroud Experiment Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt during the three successive seasons of 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The present study aimed at measuring the efficiency of two methods of selection used in the flax breeding program namely; pedigree method (PM) and bulk method (BM) on one flax population droved from previous work by the other (self) in 2014. F2 seed from the previous work furnished the source material for subsequent generations of flax populations (S2465/1 × Giza 8). In 2017 season, the high yielding selected lines (20) from each methods of breeding (two methods i.e. pedigree and bulk). Comparison between two breeding methods, mean square due to breeding methods were significant for days to flowering , No. of capsules / plant , length of fruiting zone , No. of seeds / capsule , seed index , seed yield /plant , technical stem length , and oil percentage. This result indicated the difference between breading methods. The pedigree methods gave the highest value for all traits. The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits may be due to the two parent good combiner for most traits. Also, gave the earliness of days to flowering. These result in this cross where a two parent were good combiner for most trait. For days to flowering, the result indicated that the pedigree method produced more superior lines than bulk method compared the best parent with fifteen and sixteen lines respectably. The best line was No. 7 of pedigree method. As for No. of capsule/ plant , 20 and 9 lines showed significant higher than best parent for pedigree and bulk method gave the highest number of capsules/ plant . Regarding to No. of basal branches/plant, the pedigree method produced consistently none superior parent compared the best parent, with three and four lines for pedigree and bulk, respectively. For No. of seeds / capsules, only the line No. 14 of pedigree method of breeding gave the highest no. of seeds / capsule. Concerning seed index, all lines of pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent. Also, the line No. 9 of pedigree method gave the behavior seed index. With regard to seed yield/plant, four and six lines surpassed significant seed. Yield compare the best parent. The best line was No. 19 of pedigree followed by No. 2 of bulk method of breeding. For total length, sixteen lines of both breeding methods surpassed significant compare the best parent. The best line was No. 1 of pedigree method (123, 67). Regarding technical stem length, fourteen and nine lines showed significant higher than the best parent for pedigree and bulk methods, respectively the best line was No. 6 (112. 67 ) followed by No. 5 ( 111 . 33 ) of pedigree method . For fiber percentage, none of lines showed significant compare the best parent or over mean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pedigree method gave the highest values for all traits compared with the bulk method in flax.

Treatment
pedigree methodse1
Outcome
all traitse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
bulk methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pedigree methods gave the highest value for all traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1064 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pedigree method was more efficient than the bulk method for selection based on these traits in flax.

Treatment
pedigree methode0
Outcome
selection based on these traitse0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
bulk methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pedigree method produced more superior lines than the best parent for days to flowering, with fifteen and sixteen lines.

Treatment
pedigree methode6
Outcome
days to floweringe6
Direction
more superiore6
Value
fifteen and sixteen linese6
Comparator
best parente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“For days to flowering, the result indicated that the pedigree method produced more superior lines than bulk method compared the best parent with fifteen and sixteen lines respectably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pedigree lines showed significantly higher number of capsules per plant than the best parent.

Treatment
pedigreee2
Outcome
No. of capsule/ plante2
Direction
significant highere2
Qualifier
20 and 9 linese2
Comparator
best parente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“For No. of capsule/ plant , 20 and 9 lines showed significant higher than best parent for pedigree and bulk method gave the highest number of capsules/ plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1585–1742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four and six lines surpassed the best parent in seed yield per plant.

Outcome
seed yield/plante3
Direction
surpassede3
Value
four and six linese3
Comparator
best parente3

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“With regard to seed yield/plant, four and six lines surpassed significant seed. Yield compare the best parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2220–2329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All lines of the pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent for seed index.

Treatment
pedigree and bulk methodse4
Outcome
seed indexe4
Direction
surpassede4
Comparator
best parente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“Concerning seed index, all lines of pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2061–2148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen and nine lines of the pedigree and bulk methods showed significantly higher technical stem length than the best parent.

Treatment
pedigree and bulk methodse5
Outcome
technical stem lengthe5
Direction
significant highere5
Value
fourteen and nine linese5
Comparator
best parente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“Regarding technical stem length, fourteen and nine lines showed significant higher than the best parent for pedigree and bulk methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2572–2705 · show in text ↑