Paper · 2022 · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT

Effect of Black Plastic Mulching on Yield of Tomato

Angana Sarmah; Palash Thengal; Arifa M Begum; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of polyethylene mulch has increased dramatically in the last few years because they have many benefits viz., increase in soil temperature especially in early spring, reduced weed problem, moisture conservation and increased crop yields. Field experiments were conducted to maximize total yield of tomato (Lycopersicon Mill.) using black polyethylene mulch (BPM). Tomato variety Arka Rakshak having triple disease resistance against tomato leaf curl virus, bacterial wilt and early blight. Unmulched treatments under recommended N:P2O5:K2O dose of 120:200:200 yielded an average of 47.74 tha-1for ‘Arka Rakshak ’ which was significantly higher than the widely cultivated var.‘Rocky’(32.20tha-1 ) in the study area. With BPM, highest yield was recorded as 55.3 t/ha in var. Arka Raksha kwhich was significantly higher than cultivar Rocky (37.2 t/ha). A significant increase in yield was recorded over control (no mulch) in both the cultivars. Keywords: Tomato, Black plastic mulch, Unmulch, Triple disease resistance, Cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched Arka Rakshak yielded 47.74 tha-1, significantly higher than Rocky at 32.20tha-1.

Taxon
Arka Rakshake0
Material
Arka Rakshake0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.74 tha-1e0
Qualifier
32.20tha-1e0
Comparator
Rockye0

Verbatim

e0

“Unmulched treatments under recommended N:P2O5:K2O dose of 120:200:200 yielded an average of 47.74 tha-1for ‘Arka Rakshak ’ which was significantly higher than the widely cultivated var.‘Rocky’(32.20tha-1 ) in the study area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under BPM Arka Rakshak yielded 55.3 t/ha, significantly above Rocky at 37.2 t/ha.

Material
Arka Raksha ke0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.3 t/hae0
Qualifier
37.2 t/hae0
Comparator
Rockye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With BPM, highest yield was recorded as 55.3 t/ha in var. Arka Raksha kwhich was significantly higher than cultivar Rocky (37.2 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic mulch significantly increased yield over no mulch in both cultivars.

Treatment
BPMe1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
no mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in yield was recorded over control (no mulch) in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“With BPM, highest yield was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–758 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.