Abstract
Leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) is a critical indicator of crop nutrient status. In this study, the feasibility of using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy combined with deep learning to estimate LNC in cotton leaves was explored. The samples were collected from cotton's whole growth cycle, and the spectra were from different measurement environments. The random frog (RF), weighted partial least squares regression (WPLS), and saliency map were used for characteristic wavelength selection. Qualitative models (partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine for classification (SVC), convolutional neural network classification (CNNC) and quantitative models (partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector machine for regression (SVR), convolutional neural network regression (CNNR)) were established based on the full spectra and characteristic wavelengths. Satisfactory results were obtained by models based on CNN. The classification accuracy of leaves in three different LNC ranges was up to 83.34%, and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of quantitative prediction models of cotton leaves was as low as 3.36. In addition, the identification of cotton leaves based on the predicted LNC also achieved good results. These results indicated that the nitrogen content of cotton leaves could be effectively detected by deep learning and visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, which has great potential for real-world application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
CNN-based models gave satisfactory results for cotton leaf nitrogen estimation.
- Taxon
- cotton leaves
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- Satisfactory resultse0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Satisfactory results were obtained by models based on CNN.”
t0“cotton leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Classification accuracy across three leaf nitrogen ranges reached 83.34%.
- Taxon
- cotton leaves
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- classification accuracye0
- Direction
- up toe0
- Value
- 83.34%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The classification accuracy of leaves in three different LNC ranges was up to 83.34%”
t0“cotton leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Prediction RMSEP for cotton leaves was as low as 3.36.
- Taxon
- cotton leaves
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Outcome
- root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP)e0
- Direction
- as low ase0
- Value
- 3.36e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of quantitative prediction models of cotton leaves was as low as 3.36.”
Claim · model-written summary
Identifying cotton leaves using predicted leaf nitrogen also performed well.
- Taxon
- cotton leaves
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Outcome
- good resultse0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the identification of cotton leaves based on the predicted LNC also achieved good results.”