Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Visible and near-infrared spectroscopy and deep learning application for the qualitative and quantitative investigation of nitrogen status in cotton leaves

Qinlin Xiao; Na Wu; Wentan Tang; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) is a critical indicator of crop nutrient status. In this study, the feasibility of using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy combined with deep learning to estimate LNC in cotton leaves was explored. The samples were collected from cotton's whole growth cycle, and the spectra were from different measurement environments. The random frog (RF), weighted partial least squares regression (WPLS), and saliency map were used for characteristic wavelength selection. Qualitative models (partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine for classification (SVC), convolutional neural network classification (CNNC) and quantitative models (partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector machine for regression (SVR), convolutional neural network regression (CNNR)) were established based on the full spectra and characteristic wavelengths. Satisfactory results were obtained by models based on CNN. The classification accuracy of leaves in three different LNC ranges was up to 83.34%, and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of quantitative prediction models of cotton leaves was as low as 3.36. In addition, the identification of cotton leaves based on the predicted LNC also achieved good results. These results indicated that the nitrogen content of cotton leaves could be effectively detected by deep learning and visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, which has great potential for real-world application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CNN-based models gave satisfactory results for cotton leaf nitrogen estimation.

Taxon
cotton leavesGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
Satisfactory resultse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Satisfactory results were obtained by models based on CNN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–155 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Classification accuracy across three leaf nitrogen ranges reached 83.34%.

Taxon
cotton leavesGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
classification accuracye0
Direction
up toe0
Value
83.34%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The classification accuracy of leaves in three different LNC ranges was up to 83.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–155 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction RMSEP for cotton leaves was as low as 3.36.

Taxon
cotton leavesGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP)e0
Direction
as low ase0
Value
3.36e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of quantitative prediction models of cotton leaves was as low as 3.36.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1176 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Identifying cotton leaves using predicted leaf nitrogen also performed well.

Taxon
cotton leavesGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
good resultse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the identification of cotton leaves based on the predicted LNC also achieved good results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1280 · show in text ↑