Paper · 2023 · Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems

IMPACT OF TILLAGE PRACTICES ON PROPERTIES OF SOIL, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND PRODUCTIVITY OF COWPEA IN NIGERIA

Kabiru Alani Shittu; Omotayo Babawande Adeboye; Durodoluwa Joseph Oyedele; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Tillage is one of the major threats to soil health which often results into soil physical degradation if not properly managed. Zero tillage is an alternative option from both economic and environmental protection of our soil resources points of view. Objective. To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices. Methodology. The study was conducted in Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife Osun State, Nigeria using a replicated randomized complete block design with treatments consisting of Zero-tillage (ZT), Reduced tillage (RT), Conventional tillage + Mulch (CT + ML) and Conventional tillage (CT). Results. Soil penetration resistance (SPR) increased with the degree of soil manipulation during tillage practices. Penetration resistance (PR) across 15-30 cm in 2019 alone resulted in higher PR of 2.26 MPa for RT compared to 0.71, 0.72 and 0.79 MPa for ZT, CT + (ML and CT), respectively, approximately 218 %, 213 % and 186 % greater in RT than ZT, CT + ML and CT respectively. Implications. Cowpea production on sandy loam soil can be optimized with Zero tillage. Conclusion. Over a period of two years, ZT practice had the highest profit margin of $ 573, among the practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil penetration resistance increased with the degree of soil manipulation during tillage.

Treatment
degree of soil manipulatione1
Outcome
Soil penetration resistance (SPR)e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil penetration resistance (SPR) increased with the degree of soil manipulation during tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage gave higher penetration resistance (2.26 MPa) than zero tillage and conventional tillage at 15-30 cm in 2019.

Treatment
RTe2
Outcome
Penetration resistance (PR)e2
Direction
highere2
Value
2.26 MPae2
Qualifier
0.71, 0.72 and 0.79 MPa for ZT, CT + (ML and CT), respectivelye2
Comparator
ZTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penetration resistance (PR) across 15-30 cm in 2019 alone resulted in higher PR of 2.26 MPa for RT compared to 0.71, 0.72 and 0.79 MPa for ZT, CT + (ML and CT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage penetration resistance was about 218% greater than under zero tillage.

Treatment
RTe3
Outcome
Penetration resistance (PR)e2
Direction
greatere3
Value
218 %e3
Comparator
ZTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penetration resistance (PR) across 15-30 cm in 2019 alone resulted in higher PR of 2.26 MPa for RT compared to 0.71, 0.72 and 0.79 MPa for ZT, CT + (ML and CT), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–965 · show in text ↑
e3

“approximately 218 %, 213 % and 186 % greater in RT than ZT, CT + ML and CT respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest profit margin of $573 over two years among the practices.

Treatment
ZT practicee4
Outcome
profit margine4
Direction
higheste4
Value
$ 573e4
Qualifier
Over a period of two yearse4
Comparator
the practicese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–385 · show in text ↑
e4

“Over a period of two years, ZT practice had the highest profit margin of $ 573, among the practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea production on sandy loam soil can be optimized with zero tillage.

Treatment
Zero tillagee5
Outcome
productione5
Setting
sandy loam soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To evaluate responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) yield and evapotranspiration to different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–385 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cowpea production on sandy loam soil can be optimized with Zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1141 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.