Paper · 2023 · Plants

Hydroponic Common-Bean Performance under Reduced N-Supply Level and Rhizobia Application

Ioannis Karavidas; Georgia Ntatsi; Theodora Ntanasi; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aims to explore the possibility of a reduced application of inorganic nitrogen (N) fertiliser on the yield, yield qualities, and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) of the hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), without compromising plant performance, by utilizing the inherent ability of this plant to symbiotically fix N2. Until the flowering stage, plants were supplied with a nutrient solution containing N-concentrations of either a, 100%, conventional standard-practice, 13.8 mM; b, 75% of the standard, 10.35 mM; or c, 50% of the standard, 6.9 mM. During the subsequent reproductive stage, inorganic-N treatments b and c were decreased to 25% of the standard, and the standard (100% level) N-application was not altered. The three different inorganic-N supply treatments were combined with two different rhizobia strains, and a control (no-inoculation) treatment, in a two-factorial experiment. The rhizobia strains applied were either the indigenous strain Rhizobium sophoriradicis PVTN21 or the commercially supplied Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. Results showed that the 50–25% mineral-N application regime led to significant increases in nodulation, BNF, and fresh-pod yield, compared to the other treatment, with a reduced inorganic-N supply. On the other hand, the 75–25% mineral-N regime applied during the vegetative stage restricted nodulation and BNF, thus incurring significant yield losses. Both rhizobia strains stimulated nodulation and BNF. However, the BNF capacity they facilitated was suppressed as the inorganic-N input increased. In addition, strain PVTN21 was superior to CIAT 899—as 50–25% N-treated plants inoculated with the former showed a yield loss of 11%, compared to the 100%-N-treated plants. In conclusion, N-use efficiency optimises BNF, reduces mineral-N-input dependency, and therefore may reduce any consequential negative environmental consequences of mineral-N over-application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50-25% mineral-N regime significantly increased nodulation, biological N fixation and fresh-pod yield of hydroponic common bean compared with the other reduced inorganic-N treatment.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
50–25% mineral-N application regimee1
Outcome
nodulation, BNF, and fresh-pod yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
the other treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 50–25% mineral-N application regime led to significant increases in nodulation, BNF, and fresh-pod yield, compared to the other treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75-25% mineral-N regime applied in the vegetative stage restricted nodulation and biological N fixation in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagee1
Treatment
75–25% mineral-N regimee1
Outcome
nodulation and BNFe1
Direction
restrictede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 75–25% mineral-N regime applied during the vegetative stage restricted nodulation and BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75-25% mineral-N regime applied in the vegetative stage caused significant yield losses in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagee1
Treatment
75–25% mineral-N regimee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
lossese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 75–25% mineral-N regime applied during the vegetative stage restricted nodulation and BNF, thus incurring significant yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both rhizobia strains stimulated nodulation and biological N fixation in common bean relative to the no-inoculation control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
rhizobia strainse1
Interactor
rhizobiae1symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and BNFe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Comparator
no-inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both rhizobia strains stimulated nodulation and BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1476 · show in text ↑
e2

“a control (no-inoculation) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biological N fixation capacity facilitated by the rhizobia strains was suppressed as inorganic-N input increased.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
inorganic-N inpute1
Outcome
BNF capacitye1
Direction
suppressede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“the BNF capacity they facilitated was suppressed as the inorganic-N input increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium strain PVTN21 was superior to strain CIAT 899 in common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
strain PVTN21e1
Interactor
PVTN21e1symbiont
Second interactor
CIAT 899e1symbiont
Outcome
superiore1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
CIAT 899e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“strain PVTN21 was superior to CIAT 899”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean plants given the 50-25% N regime and inoculated with PVTN21 showed an 11% yield loss compared with plants given 100% N.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
50–25% N-treated plantse1
Interactor
PVTN21e2symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
losse1
Value
11%e1
Comparator
100%-N-treated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“50–25% N-treated plants inoculated with the former showed a yield loss of 11%, compared to the 100%-N-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1743 · show in text ↑
e2

“strain PVTN21”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1598 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that N-use efficiency optimises biological N fixation and reduces dependency on mineral N input.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
BNFe1
Qualifier
N-use efficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydroponic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“N-use efficiency optimises BNF, reduces mineral-N-input dependency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1826 · show in text ↑