Paper · 2023 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Factoring labour when comparing in situ rainwater harvesting technologies for semi-arid areas of central Tanzania

Elirehema Y. Swai; Lutengano Mwinuka; Mawazo J. Shitindi; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Erratic rainfall, high evapotranspiration rates and droughts are major factors limiting crop production in semi-arid areas. Tied ridges that have crossed ties within the furrow are among the physical soil and water conservation measures. During the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons, we examined the efficacy of repaired tied ridges for maize crop (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Kongwa district of Tanzania as an alternate labour saving strategy for managing climate risks associated with variable rainfall. Treatments consisted of three tillage methods: conventional tillage (CT) which involved the preparation of a flat seedbed using handhoe, annually constructed tied ridges (ATR) and tied ridges that had been constructed during the previous season and had been repaired (residual tied ridges–RTR). Data were collected on labour requirements and crop performance. RTR increased economic returns by 29% and 80% over ATR and CT, respectively. Maize grain yield shows a trend of RTR >ATR>CT with values ranging from 2465 kg ha−1 to 4185 kg ha−1 (P < 0.01). While tillage and/or variety did not influence sorghum grain yield significantly (P > 0.05). The use of RTR is recommended because of low labour requirements and greater economic benefits than CT and ATR under maize cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repaired tied ridges increased economic returns by 29% relative to annually constructed ridges.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RTRe0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
ATRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTR increased economic returns by 29% and 80% over ATR and CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Kongwa district of Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repaired tied ridges increased economic returns by 80% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RTRe0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTR increased economic returns by 29% and 80% over ATR and CT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize crop (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Kongwa district of Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield ranked repaired above annual ridges above conventional tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RTRe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
RTR >ATR>CTe0
Value
2465 kg ha−1 to 4185 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
ATR>CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yield shows a trend of RTR >ATR>CT with values ranging from 2465 kg ha−1 to 4185 kg ha−1 (P < 0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage or variety did not significantly influence sorghum grain yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
tillage and/or varietye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage and/or variety did not influence sorghum grain yield significantly (P > 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1157 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend repaired tied ridges for maize systems because of labor and economic benefits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
use of RTRe0
Comparator
CT and ATRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of RTR is recommended because of low labour requirements and greater economic benefits than CT and ATR under maize cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1298 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 102 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.