Paper · 2022 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Impact of different rates and dates of phosphorus applications on growth parameters, yield and quality in Egyptian clover

Walaa Mousa; Mervat Sayed; Magda Rajab; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) rates and its date of application is considered some of the most important factor affecting crop growth, yield and nutritive value in Egyptian clover.Two field experiments were conducted at Sids Agriculture Research Station, Bani Sweif Governorate.ARC, Egypt, during the winter growing seasons of 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 to study the impact of use different rates and date of phosphorus applications on growth parameters, forage yield and quality in Egyptian clover (var.Giza 6).The experimental treatments were arranged in a split plot design with three replicates.The main plots represented three different rates of phosphorus (A1=100, A2=150 and A3=200 kg fed -1 superphosphate), whereas the sub-plots included the three dates of phosphorus applications (B1= one dose before planting, B2= two equal doses before planting and the second before first irrigation and B3= two equal doses one before first irrigation and the second before second irrigation).The main obvious results of this study could be summarized as follows; the rates of phosphorus applications had a significant effect on all traits under study of clover crop and maximum values were obtained with A3 treatment but it was on a par with A2 treatment.On the contrary, minimum values for the corresponding respective characters were recorded with A1 treatment.It could be stated that all traits were gradually increased due to applying the assessed rates of phosphorus.Whilst, in case of the dates of phosphorus application, data indicated that B2 treatment were superior compared with the other treatments for all traits.The highest values of interaction were obtained with A3 treatment and B2 treatment for growth parameters, yield and quality.Besides that, a feasibility study proved that Egyptian clover is economically advisable under treatment (200 kg fed -1 ) superphosphate added at two equal doses the first before planting and the second before first irrigation, where the maximum total revenue, net return and net return per one invested recorded (37705.5, 26185.5, 2.27 L.E.), respectively.In nutshell, optimization of P fertilization and attention to the time of addition improves the productivity and quality of the forage in Egyptian clover.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The A3 phosphorus rate gave maximum clover trait values and was on a par with A2.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Treatment
A3 treatmente0
Outcome
all traits under studye0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
A2 treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“the rates of phosphorus applications had a significant effect on all traits under study of clover crop and maximum values were obtained with A3 treatment but it was on a par with A2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A1 rate gave the minimum trait values.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Treatment
A1 treatmente0
Outcome
corresponding respective characterse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“minimum values for the corresponding respective characters were recorded with A1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B2 application date was superior for all traits.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
all traitse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“B2 treatment were superior compared with the other treatments for all traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A3 and B2 combination gave the highest growth, yield, and quality values.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Treatment
A3 treatment and B2 treatmente0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and qualitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of interaction were obtained with A3 treatment and B2 treatment for growth parameters, yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended phosphorus schedule gave total revenue of 37705.5.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Outcome
total revenuee0
Value
37705.5e0

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum total revenue, net return and net return per one invested recorded (37705.5, 26185.5, 2.27 L.E.), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended phosphorus schedule gave net return of 26185.5.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
26185.5e0

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum total revenue, net return and net return per one invested recorded (37705.5, 26185.5, 2.27 L.E.), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended phosphorus schedule gave net return per invested unit of 2.27 L.E.

Taxon
Egyptian clovert0
Outcome
net return per one investede0
Value
2.27 L.E.e0

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum total revenue, net return and net return per one invested recorded (37705.5, 26185.5, 2.27 L.E.), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2083 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 200 kg fed -1 superphosphate in two equal doses before planting and before first irrigation.

Taxon
Egyptian clovere0
Treatment
200 kg fed -1 ) superphosphate added at two equal doses the first before planting and the second before first irrigatione0
Outcome
economically advisablee0

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian clover is economically advisable under treatment (200 kg fed -1 ) superphosphate added at two equal doses the first before planting and the second before first irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1953 · show in text ↑