Paper · 2023 · Remote Sensing

Optimizing Wheat Yield Prediction Integrating Data from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 with CatBoost Algorithm

Asier Uribeetxebarria; Ander Castellón; Ana Aizpurua

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Accurately estimating wheat yield is crucial for informed decision making in precision agriculture (PA) and improving crop management. In recent years, optical satellite-derived vegetation indices (Vis), such as Sentinel-2 (S2), have become widely used, but the availability of images depends on the weather conditions. For its part, Sentinel-1 (S1) backscatter data are less used in agriculture due to its complicated interpretation and processing, but is not impacted by weather. This study investigates the potential benefits of combining S1 and S2 data and evaluates the performance of the categorical boosting (CatBoost) algorithm in crop yield estimation. The study was conducted utilizing dense yield data from a yield monitor, obtained from 39 wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields. The study analyzed three S2 images corresponding to different crop growth stages (GS) GS30, GS39-49, and GS69-75, and 13 Vis commonly used for wheat yield estimation were calculated for each image. In addition, three S1 images that were temporally close to the S2 images were acquired, and the vertical-vertical (VV) and vertical-horizontal (VH) backscatter were calculated. The performance of the CatBoost algorithm was compared to that of multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) algorithms in crop yield estimation. The results showed that the combination of S1 and S2 data with the CatBoost algorithm produced a yield prediction with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.24 t ha−1, a relative RMSE (rRMSE) 3.46% and an R2 of 0.95. The result indicates a decrease of 30% in RMSE when compared to using S2 alone. However, when this algorithm was used to estimate the yield of a whole plot, leveraging information from the surrounding plots, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.31 t ha−1 which means a mean error of 4.38%. Accurate wheat yield estimation with a spatial resolution of 10 m becomes feasible when utilizing satellite data combined with CatBoost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined S1 and S2 data with CatBoost predicted wheat yield with RMSE 0.24 t ha−1.

Outcome
root mean squared error (RMSE)e0
Value
0.24 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of S1 and S2 data with the CatBoost algorithm produced a yield prediction with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.24 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1516 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined S1 and S2 data with CatBoost had relative RMSE 3.46%.

Outcome
relative RMSE (rRMSE)e0
Value
3.46%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a relative RMSE (rRMSE) 3.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1547 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined S1 and S2 data with CatBoost had R2 of 0.95.

Outcome
R2e0
Value
0.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an R2 of 0.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining S1 with S2 reduced RMSE by 30% relative to S2 alone.

Outcome
RMSEe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
S2 alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease of 30% in RMSE when compared to using S2 alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1645 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plot estimation using surrounding plots had MAE 0.31 t ha−1.

Outcome
mean absolute error (MAE)e0
Value
0.31 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.31 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1775–1820 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plot estimation had mean error 4.38%.

Outcome
mean errore0
Value
4.38%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mean error of 4.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1833–1854 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum spp. L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–783 · show in text ↑