Abstract
Abstract This experiment was conducted in a farmer’s field in Al-Najmi district, Al-Muthanna governorate, 3 km away from the district center during the agricultural season 2021-2022, to determine the effect of sources and levels of zinc spraying on the yield of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), as zinc was used. Nano zinc (12% Zn), chelated zinc (14% Zn) and zinc sulfate (23% Zn) and a symbol for the sources with the symbol (S2, S3, S1) in sequence, and four levels (0, 100, 200, 300) mg Zn l-1, symbol It has (L4, L3, L2, L1) respectively, as it was sprayed on the wheat crop Rashid in two stages when branching and flowering. The experiment was conducted using factorial trials, randomized complete block Design (RCBD), with three replications. Thus, the number of experimental units is (4*3*3)=36. The results show that the superiority of nano-zinc at the level of 300PPM on the flag leaf area and the number of grains in the spike, as the highest averages, while zinc sulfate at the level of 200PPM outperformed in the trait of plant height, as it recorded the highest average, as well as the superiority of zinc sulphate at the level of 300PPM in the trait of spike length, number of branches, and grain yield, which recorded the highest averages.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-zinc at 300PPM gave the highest flag leaf area and grain number per spike.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- nano-zinc at the level of 300PPMe0
- Outcome
- flag leaf area and the number of grains in the spikee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results show that the superiority of nano-zinc at the level of 300PPM on the flag leaf area and the number of grains in the spike, as the highest averages”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulfate at 200PPM gave the highest plant height.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- zinc sulfate at the level of 200PPMe0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while zinc sulfate at the level of 200PPM outperformed in the trait of plant height, as it recorded the highest average”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulphate at 300PPM gave the highest spike length, branch number, and grain yield.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- zinc sulphate at the level of 300PPMe0
- Outcome
- spike length, number of branches, and grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“as well as the superiority of zinc sulphate at the level of 300PPM in the trait of spike length, number of branches, and grain yield, which recorded the highest averages.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
256 papers more in this group
See all 260 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.