Paper · 2015 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Weed Management in Rice Fallow Black Gram through Post-Emergence Herbicides

Ramesh T; Rathika S

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai during Rabi season of 2011 and 2012 to find out the suitable early post-emergence herbicides to manage the emerged weeds and re-growth of paddy stubbles in rice fallow black gram. The treatments consisted of three levels (50, 75 and 100 g/ha) of early post- emergence herbicides viz., Imazethapyr 10% SL and Quizalofop ethyl 5% EC which were tested alone and in combination and also compared with farmers’ practice of no weeding. Results revealed that lesser weed density was obtained with application of imazethapyr + quizalofop ethyl, each at75g/ha in both the years. Application of quizalofop ethyl alone or in combination with imazethapyr at all the three levels recorded higher weed control efficiency (> 80%) over imazethapyr alone. Higher mean yield of 721 kg/ha was obtained with application of both herbicides each at 50 g/ha and it was comparable with all the quizalofop ethyl treatments as well as application of both herbicides at all the doses. Higher mean net return of Rs.25375/ha was registered with application of both herbicides, each at 50 g/ha. However, higher return per rupee invested (BC Ratio) was obtained under application of quizalofop ethyl alone at 50g/ha during both the years (3.43). Thus, based on the weed control efficiency, seed yield and returns, it could be concluded that application of quizalofop ethyl at 50g/ha on 20 DAS will be effective for controlling emerged grassy weeds and re-growth of paddy stubbles in rice fallow black gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined herbicides at 75g/ha yielded the lowest weed density in both years.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
imazethapyr + quizalofop ethyl, each at75g/hae0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lessere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lesser weed density was obtained with application of imazethapyr + quizalofop ethyl, each at75g/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop alone or combined with imazethapyr gave over 80% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
quizalofop ethyl alonee0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
> 80%e0
Comparator
imazethapyr alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of quizalofop ethyl alone or in combination with imazethapyr at all the three levels recorded higher weed control efficiency (> 80%) over imazethapyr alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two herbicides at 50 g/ha each gave mean yield of 721 kg/ha.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
both herbicides each at 50 g/hae0
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Value
721 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher mean yield of 721 kg/ha was obtained with application of both herbicides each at 50 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two herbicides at 50 g/ha each gave mean net return of Rs.25375/ha.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
both herbicides, each at 50 g/hae0
Outcome
mean net returne0
Direction
Highere0
Value
Rs.25375/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher mean net return of Rs.25375/ha was registered with application of both herbicides, each at 50 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop alone at 50g/ha produced the highest return per rupee invested, 3.43.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungot0
Treatment
quizalofop ethyl alone at 50g/hae0
Outcome
return per rupee invested (BC Ratio)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher return per rupee invested (BC Ratio) was obtained under application of quizalofop ethyl alone at 50g/ha during both the years (3.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“black gram”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend quizalofop ethyl at 50g/ha on 20 DAS for grassy weeds and paddy stubble regrowth.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe0
Outcome
application of quizalofop ethyl at 50g/ha on 20 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of quizalofop ethyl at 50g/ha on 20 DAS will be effective for controlling emerged grassy weeds and re-growth of paddy stubbles in rice fallow black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1556 · show in text ↑

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 89 positive, 6 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.