Paper · 2023 · OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi provides enhanced development and reduced mite incidence in Phaseolus vulgaris L. by direct root colonization and via the common mycorrhizal network

Bruno do Valle Antonucci; Luis Eduardo Azevedo Marques Lescano; Nathalia Dutra Lameu; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important to agriculture due to positive effects on development and resistance to attack by herbivores in agricultural crops. AMF can affect a single plant by directly colonizing its roots and two or more plants through the common mycorrhizal network (CMN). This work aimed to analyze the influence of AMF on the development of Phaseolus vulgaris and on the incidence of the mite Tetranychus urticae in bean plants colonized directly by mycorrhizal propagules or linked by the CMN. The root systems of two plants were either separated by an impassable barrier so that one or both plants could be colonized by the mycorrhizal propagules without forming the RMC, or they were separated by a steel mesh that allowed the outer hyphae of the AMF on the roots of one of the plants to colonize the non-mycorrhizal roots of the other plant and form the RMC. The mite infestation occurred first on one plant and at the end of the experiment on all. Percentage of mycorrhizal colonization, dry mass of aerial part and roots, number of reproductive structures and mite incidence were analyzed. The colonization by the mycorrhizal propagules and the hyphae of the MRC positively influenced the vegetative and reproductive development of P. vulgaris and resulted in lower mite incidence on the leaflets of the plants. Therefore, direct colonization of P. vulgaris roots by AMFs and via CMR improves plant development and resistance of bean plants to T. urticae mite infestation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct mycorrhizal propagule colonization improved vegetative development.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
colonization by the mycorrhizal propagulese0
Interactor
mycorrhizal propagulese0symbiont
Outcome
vegetative and reproductive developmente0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colonization by the mycorrhizal propagules and the hyphae of the MRC positively influenced the vegetative and reproductive development of P. vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyphal colonization via the common mycorrhizal network improved reproductive development.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
hyphae of the MRCe0
Interactor
hyphae of the MRCe0symbiont
Outcome
reproductive developmente0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The colonization by the mycorrhizal propagules and the hyphae of the MRC positively influenced the vegetative and reproductive development of P. vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization reduced mite incidence on bean leaflets.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
colonization by the mycorrhizal propagules and the hyphae of the MRCe1
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee2pest
Second interactor
mycorrhizal propagulese1symbiont
Outcome
mite incidence on the leafletse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in lower mite incidence on the leaflets of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1342 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tetranychus urticae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–438 · show in text ↑
e1

“The colonization by the mycorrhizal propagules and the hyphae of the MRC positively influenced the vegetative and reproductive development of P. vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1275 · show in text ↑

infection · Tetranychus urticae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · Tetranychus urticae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.