Paper · 2023 · Environmental Microbiology

Mycena species can be opportunist‐generalist plant root invaders

Christoffer Bugge Harder; Emily Hesling; Synnøve S. Botnen; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Traditional strict separation of fungi into ecological niches as mutualist, parasite or saprotroph is increasingly called into question. Sequences of assumed saprotrophs have been amplified from plant root interiors, and several saprotrophic genera can invade and interact with host plants in laboratory growth experiments. However, it is uncertain if root invasion by saprotrophic fungi is a widespread phenomenon and if laboratory interactions mirror field conditions. Here, we focused on the widespread and speciose saprotrophic genus Mycena and performed (1) a systematic survey of their occurrences (in ITS1/ITS2 datasets) in mycorrhizal roots of 10 plant species, and (2) an analysis of natural abundances of 13 C/ 15 N stable isotope signatures of Mycena basidiocarps from five field locations to examine their trophic status. We found that Mycena was the only saprotrophic genus consistently found in 9 out of 10 plant host roots, with no indication that the host roots were senescent or otherwise vulnerable. Furthermore, Mycena basidiocarps displayed isotopic signatures consistent with published 13 C/ 15 N profiles of both saprotrophic and mutualistic lifestyles, supporting earlier laboratory‐based studies. We argue that Mycena are widespread latent invaders of healthy plant roots and that Mycena species may form a spectrum of interactions besides saprotrophy also in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycena occurred consistently in nine of ten plant host roots.

Taxon
plant host rootse0
Interactor
MycenaMycenae0other
Outcome
consistently founde0
Value
9 out of 10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mycena
Mycena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Dan Molter (shroomydan) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycena was the only saprotrophic genus consistently found in 9 out of 10 plant host roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The host roots showed no indication of senescence or vulnerability.

Taxon
host rootse0
Outcome
senescent or otherwise vulnerablee0

Verbatim

e0

“with no indication that the host roots were senescent or otherwise vulnerable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycena isotopic signatures matched both saprotrophic and mutualistic profiles.

Taxon
MycenaMycenae0
Outcome
isotopic signaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mycena
Mycena · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Dan Molter (shroomydan) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycena basidiocarps displayed isotopic signatures consistent with published 13 C/ 15 N profiles of both saprotrophic and mutualistic lifestyles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that Mycena are widespread latent invaders of healthy roots and have varied field interactions.

Taxon
plant rootse0
Outcome
spectrum of interactionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Mycena are widespread latent invaders of healthy plant roots and that Mycena species may form a spectrum of interactions besides saprotrophy also in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1402 · show in text ↑