Paper · 2023 · Genes

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Türkiye Bread Wheat Genotypes Revealed by Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) Markers

Aras Türkoğlu; Kamil Haliloğlu; Seyyed Abolgahasem Mohammadi; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat genotypes should be improved through available germplasm genetic diversity to ensure food security. This study investigated the molecular diversity and population structure of a set of Türkiye bread wheat genotypes using 120 microsatellite markers. Based on the results, 651 polymorphic alleles were evaluated to determine genetic diversity and population structure. The number of alleles ranged from 2 to 19, with an average of 5.44 alleles per locus. Polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.031 to 0.915 with a mean of 0.43. In addition, the gene diversity index ranged from 0.03 to 0.92 with an average of 0.46. The expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.359 with a mean of 0.124. The unbiased expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.319 with an average of 0.112. The mean values of the number of effective alleles (Ne), genetic diversity of Nei (H) and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated at 1.190, 1.049 and 0.168, respectively. The highest genetic diversity (GD) was estimated between genotypes G1 and G27. In the UPGMA dendrogram, the 63 genotypes were grouped into three clusters. The three main coordinates were able to explain 12.64, 6.38 and 4.90% of genetic diversity, respectively. AMOVA revealed diversity within populations at 78% and between populations at 22%. The current populations were found to be highly structured. Model-based cluster analyses classified the 63 genotypes studied into three subpopulations. The values of F-statistic (Fst) for the identified subpopulations were 0.253, 0.330 and 0.244, respectively. In addition, the expected values of heterozygosity (He) for these sub-populations were recorded as 0.45, 0.46 and 0.44, respectively. Therefore, SSR markers can be useful not only in genetic diversity and association analysis of wheat but also in its germplasm for various agronomic traits or mechanisms of tolerance to environmental stresses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat genotypes had 651 polymorphic alleles.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
polymorphic allelese0
Value
651e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“651 polymorphic alleles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–300 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 19 and averaged 5.44.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
number of allelese0
Value
2 to 19e0
Qualifier
average of 5.44 alleles per locuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of alleles ranged from 2 to 19, with an average of 5.44 alleles per locus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PIC ranged from 0.031 to 0.915, averaging 0.43.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Polymorphic information contente0
Value
0.031 to 0.915e0
Qualifier
mean of 0.43e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.031 to 0.915 with a mean of 0.43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gene diversity index ranged from 0.03 to 0.92, averaging 0.46.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
gene diversity indexe0
Value
0.03 to 0.92e0
Qualifier
average of 0.46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“gene diversity index ranged from 0.03 to 0.92 with an average of 0.46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–631 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.359, averaging 0.124.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
expected heterozygositye0
Value
0.00 to 0.359e0
Qualifier
mean of 0.124e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.359 with a mean of 0.124”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unbiased expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.319, averaging 0.112.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
unbiased expected heterozygositye0
Value
0.00 to 0.319e0
Qualifier
average of 0.112e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“unbiased expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.00 to 0.319 with an average of 0.112”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–796 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean number of effective alleles was 1.190.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
number of effective allelese0
Value
1.190e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“mean values of the number of effective alleles (Ne), genetic diversity of Nei (H) and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated at 1.190, 1.049 and 0.168, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean Nei genetic diversity was 1.049.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
genetic diversity of Neie0
Value
1.049e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“genetic diversity of Nei (H) and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated at 1.190, 1.049 and 0.168, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean Shannon information index was 0.168.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Shannon’s information indexe0
Value
0.168e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated at 1.190, 1.049 and 0.168, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes G1 and G27 had the highest estimated genetic diversity between genotypes.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
G1 and G27e0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest genetic diversity (GD) was estimated between genotypes G1 and G27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1053 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA grouped 63 genotypes into three clusters.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grouped into three clusterse0
Value
three clusterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the UPGMA dendrogram, the 63 genotypes were grouped into three clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first main coordinate explained 12.64% of genetic diversity.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Value
12.64e0
Qualifier
three main coordinatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The three main coordinates were able to explain 12.64, 6.38 and 4.90% of genetic diversity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second main coordinate explained 6.38% of genetic diversity.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Value
6.38e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The three main coordinates were able to explain 12.64, 6.38 and 4.90% of genetic diversity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third main coordinate explained 4.90% of genetic diversity.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Value
4.90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The three main coordinates were able to explain 12.64, 6.38 and 4.90% of genetic diversity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMOVA attributed 78% of diversity to within-population variation.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
diversity within populationse0
Value
78%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMOVA revealed diversity within populations at 78% and between populations at 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMOVA attributed 22% of diversity to between-population variation.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
between populationse0
Value
22%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMOVA revealed diversity within populations at 78% and between populations at 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1318 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The current wheat populations were highly structured.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
highly structurede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The current populations were found to be highly structured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model-based analyses classified 63 genotypes into three subpopulations.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
three subpopulationse0
Value
three subpopulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Model-based cluster analyses classified the 63 genotypes studied into three subpopulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fst values for the three subpopulations were 0.253, 0.330 and 0.244.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
F-statistice0
Value
0.253, 0.330 and 0.244e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The values of F-statistic (Fst) for the identified subpopulations were 0.253, 0.330 and 0.244, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expected heterozygosity values for the three subpopulations were 0.45, 0.46 and 0.44.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
expected values of heterozygositye0
Value
0.45, 0.46 and 0.44e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“expected values of heterozygosity (He) for these sub-populations were recorded as 0.45, 0.46 and 0.44, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1713 · show in text ↑