Paper · 2023 · University of Thi-Qar Journal of agricultural research

A review: Machine relationship with the tractor and its effect on the productivity and compaction of agricultural soil

Hussein Abbas Jebur

2
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The influence of process speed (PS) and tillage depth (TD) , on growth of corn (Zea mays L) yield, for Maha cultivar, were tested at two ranges of PS of 2.483 and 4.011 km.hr-1, and three ranges of TD of 15,20 and 25cm. The experiments were conducted in a factorial experiment under complete randomized design with three replications. The results showed that the PS of 2.483 km.hr-1 was significantly better than the PS of 4.011km.hr-1 in all studied conditions. The , slippage ratio (SR) and the machine efficiency (ME), the physical soil characteristics represented by the soil density and porosity (SBD and TSP), and the plant characteristics represented the roots dry weight, PVI and the crop productivity (CP), except adjective of the fuel consumption (fC),which gave the best results with the second speed 4.011 km.hr-1treatment of TD of 15cm was significantly superior to the levels of 20 and 25 cm in all studied conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A process speed of 2.483 km.hr-1 was significantly better than 4.011 km.hr-1 for the studied conditions, including corn plant traits and productivity.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L)Zea mayse2
Treatment
PS of 2.483 km.hr-1e0
Outcome
roots dry weight, PVI and the crop productivity (CP)e1
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
PS of 4.011km.hr-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the PS of 2.483 km.hr-1 was significantly better than the PS of 4.011km.hr-1 in all studied conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“the plant characteristics represented the roots dry weight, PVI and the crop productivity (CP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“tractor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A tillage depth of 15 cm was significantly superior to depths of 20 and 25 cm for all studied conditions.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L)Zea mayse1
Treatment
TD of 15cme0
Outcome
roots dry weight, PVI and the crop productivity (CP)e2
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
20 and 25 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TD of 15cm was significantly superior to the levels of 20 and 25 cm in all studied conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–932 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“the plant characteristics represented the roots dry weight, PVI and the crop productivity (CP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–714 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.