Paper · 1998 · Madras Agricultural Journal

INFLUENCE OF INTERCROPPING AND MULCHING ON CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND CROP PRODUCTIVITY IN RAINFED COTTON

SOLAIAPPAN U

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Kovilpatti to study the effect of intercropping and mulching on chemical properties of soil and productivity of cotton in rainfed situation. The post harvest estimates of the available soil nutrients revealed that depletion of N was more in pre-monsoon sown crops. Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P. The application of subabul loppings or bajra straw as mulches improved the level of available N, K and organic carbon content. The cotton + clusterbean sown under pre- monsoon and mulched situations recorded higher cotton yield equivalent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-monsoon sowing caused greater postharvest soil N depletion.

Treatment
pre-monsoon sown cropse0
Outcome
depletion of Ne0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The post harvest estimates of the available soil nutrients revealed that depletion of N was more in pre-monsoon sown crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with blackgram had increased soil residual N.

Treatment
blackgrame0
Interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
residual Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with blackgram had increased soil organic carbon content of soil.

Treatment
blackgrame0
Interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
organic carbon content of soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with blackgram had depleted more soil P.

Treatment
blackgrame0
Interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
depleted moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with clusterbean had increased soil residual N.

Treatment
clusterbeane0
Interactor
clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0other
Outcome
residual Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with clusterbean had increased soil organic carbon content of soil.

Treatment
clusterbeane0
Interactor
clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0other
Outcome
organic carbon content of soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton intercropped with clusterbean had depleted more soil P.

Treatment
clusterbeane0
Interactor
clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0other
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
depleted moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping of cotton with blackgram or clusterbean had increased the residual N and organic carbon content of soil, but it depleted more of P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

subabul loppings mulch improved available N, K and organic carbon.

Treatment
subabul loppingse0
Outcome
available N, K and organic carbon contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of subabul loppings or bajra straw as mulches improved the level of available N, K and organic carbon content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

bajra straw mulch improved available N, K and organic carbon.

Treatment
bajra strawe0
Outcome
available N, K and organic carbon contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of subabul loppings or bajra straw as mulches improved the level of available N, K and organic carbon content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-monsoon cotton with clusterbean and mulch had higher cotton yield equivalent.

Treatment
clusterbean sown under pre- monsoon and mulched situationse0
Interactor
clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0other
Outcome
cotton yield equivalente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cotton + clusterbean sown under pre- monsoon and mulched situations recorded higher cotton yield equivalent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–721 · show in text ↑

Vigna mungo · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.