Paper · 2023 · Environmental Entomology

Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa (Rosales: Cannabaceae), and fertilization rates on damage caused by corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Julian B Cosner; Jerome F Grant

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Industrial hemp, Cannabis sativa L., production has been negatively impacted by larvae of corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), which feed on developing inflorescences. Adult H. zea oviposit on hemp once flowers develop, and late-instar larvae can cause serious loss to both quality and yield. A 2-year study to assess the influence of hemp variety and fertilization practices on damage caused by H. zea was conducted. Differences in damage ratings among varieties were observed in both years; however, the rate of nitrogen applied did not influence biomass yield or damage rating. These results indicate that increasing nitrogen fertility may not be an effective means of cultural control for mitigating damage from H. zea. Floral maturity was very influential on damage caused by H. zea as late-maturing varieties had much less floral injury than those which matured early in outdoor field trials. Some cannabinoids were also correlated to damage rating, but this relationship was due to late-maturing plants with immature flowers low in cannabinoid concentrations receiving less floral injury. Based on these results, the selection of high-yielding varieties that flower when ovipositional activity of H. zea is expected to decline should be the first step in an integrated pest management program for hemp production. This research expanded our knowledge of the role of fertility rate, varietal characteristics, cannabinoid profile, and floral maturity on damage caused by H. zea to hemp. Findings from this research will allow growers to make more informed agronomic decisions before planting to improve hemp production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage ratings by Helicoverpa zea differ among hemp varieties in both years.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Material
varietiese1
Interactor
Helicoverpa zeaHelicoverpa zeat1pest
Outcome
damage ratingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Differences in damage ratings among varieties were observed in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of nitrogen applied does not influence hemp biomass yield or damage rating.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
rate of nitrogen appliede2
Outcome
biomass yield or damage ratinge2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rate of nitrogen applied did not influence biomass yield or damage rating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–582 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral maturity is very influential on damage caused by Helicoverpa zea to hemp.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Floral maturitye3
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae3pest
Outcome
damage caused by H. zeae3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
t1

“corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“Floral maturity was very influential on damage caused by H. zea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-maturing hemp varieties have much less floral injury than early-maturing varieties in outdoor field trials.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Material
late-maturing varietiese4
Outcome
floral injurye4
Direction
lesse4
Comparator
those which matured earlye4
Setting
outdoor field trialse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“late-maturing varieties had much less floral injury than those which matured early in outdoor field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–900 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some cannabinoids are correlated with damage rating, but this is due to late-maturing plants with immature flowers.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Compound
cannabinoidse5
Outcome
damage ratinge5
Qualifier
late-maturing plants with immature flowerse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of varieties of hemp, Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“Some cannabinoids were also correlated to damage rating, but this relationship was due to late-maturing plants with immature flowers low in cannabinoid concentrations receiving less floral injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1097 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting high-yielding hemp varieties that flower when H. zea oviposition declines should be the first step in an integrated pest management program.

Outcome
selection of high-yielding varietiese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the selection of high-yielding varieties that flower when ovipositional activity of H. zea is expected to decline should be the first step in an integrated pest management program for hemp production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1322 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · pest · Cannabis sativaResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.