Paper · 2023 · Forest Ecology and Management

Fungal sporocarp productivity and diversity shaped by weather conditions in Pinus uncinata stands

Ángel Ponce; Josu G. Alday; José Antonio Bonet; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pinus uncinata is a species frequently growing in the tree line limit of southwestern European subalpine ecosystems, hosting fungal communities that provide relevant ecosystem services. Despite the high importance of these forests for conservation, limited prior research has analysed the sporocarp fruiting patterns. This study aims at filling this gap in knowledge by describing interannual changes in sporocarp productivity, diversity, and community composition over 5 years and identifying possible relationships with the main weather and soil physicochemical characteristics. The studied P. uncinata stands had an average annual total sporocarp productivity of 21.60 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight, hosting a total of 255 species with productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal families such as Russulaceae and Tricholomataceae that occurred mostly from mid-August to end September. In contrast, saprotrophs showed more stable productivity values from mid-August to end of November with average annual sporocarp productivity of 1.76 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight but exhibited higher fungal richness values from the start of October until the end of November. Fungal productivity and species richness were mostly influenced by weather conditions while soil physicochemical properties had implications in shaping the sporocarp community composition. This study quantifies the interannual fungal fruiting pattern of the understudied fungal communities and underlines the importance of climatic variables in shaping fungal fruiting patterns within a climate change context. In addition, this work is also of special relevance since P. uncinata ecosystems represent the tree line limit, which makes this species and its associated fungal communities especially sensitive to the potential impacts of global warming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. uncinata stands had mean annual sporocarp productivity of 21.60 kg ha-1yr−1.

Outcome
sporocarp productivitye0
Value
21.60 kg ha-1yr−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied P. uncinata stands had an average annual total sporocarp productivity of 21.60 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight, hosting a total of 255 species with productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal families such as Russulaceae and Tricholomataceae that occurred mostly from mid-August to end September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. uncinata stands hosted 255 fungal species.

Outcome
255 speciese0
Value
255 speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied P. uncinata stands had an average annual total sporocarp productivity of 21.60 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight, hosting a total of 255 species with productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal families such as Russulaceae and Tricholomataceae that occurred mostly from mid-August to end September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russulaceae and Tricholomataceae were productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal families occurring mostly from mid-August to end September.

Interactor
RussulaceaeRussulaceaee0symbiont
Second interactor
TricholomataceaeTricholomataceaee0symbiont
Outcome
productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal familiese0
Qualifier
mid-August to end Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied P. uncinata stands had an average annual total sporocarp productivity of 21.60 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight, hosting a total of 255 species with productivity-dominant ectomycorrhizal families such as Russulaceae and Tricholomataceae that occurred mostly from mid-August to end September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotroph productivity was more stable from mid-August to November and averaged 1.76 kg ha-1yr−1.

Taxon
Pinus uncinataPinus mugo subsp. uncinatat0
Outcome
saprotrophs showed more stable productivity valuese0
Value
1.76 kg ha-1yr−1e0
Qualifier
mid-August to end of Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, saprotrophs showed more stable productivity values from mid-August to end of November with average annual sporocarp productivity of 1.76 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight but exhibited higher fungal richness values from the start of October until the end of November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus uncinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotroph fungal richness was higher from early October to late November.

Taxon
Pinus uncinataPinus mugo subsp. uncinatat0
Outcome
fungal richness valuese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
from the start of October until the end of Novembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, saprotrophs showed more stable productivity values from mid-August to end of November with average annual sporocarp productivity of 1.76 kg ha-1yr−1 in dry weight but exhibited higher fungal richness values from the start of October until the end of November.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus uncinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weather conditions mostly influenced fungal productivity and species richness.

Taxon
Pinus uncinataPinus mugo subsp. uncinatat0
Outcome
Fungal productivity and species richnesse0
Setting
weather conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal productivity and species richness were mostly influenced by weather conditions while soil physicochemical properties had implications in shaping the sporocarp community composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus uncinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil physicochemical properties shaped sporocarp community composition.

Taxon
Pinus uncinataPinus mugo subsp. uncinatat0
Outcome
sporocarp community compositione0
Setting
soil physicochemical propertiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata
Pinus mugo subsp. uncinata · TaxonJoan Simon from Barcelona, España · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal productivity and species richness were mostly influenced by weather conditions while soil physicochemical properties had implications in shaping the sporocarp community composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus uncinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–90 · show in text ↑