Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

Correlation of the Effect of Native Bioagents on Soil Properties and Their Influence on Stem Rot Disease of Rice

Sowmya Vanama; Maruthi Pesari; Gobinath Rajendran; et al.

18
claims
45
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil is a crucial component for plant growth, as it provides water, nutrients, and mechanical support. Various factors, such as crop cultivation, microflora, nutrient addition, and water availability, significantly affect soil properties. Maintaining soil health is important, and one approach is the introduction of native organisms with multifaceted activities. The study evaluates the effects of introducing these microbes (Trichoderma asperellum strain TAIK1, Bacillus cabrialesii strain BIK3, Pseudomonas putida strain PIK1, and Pseudomonas otitidis strain POPS1) and their consortium, a combination of four bioagents, on soil health, plant growth, and the incidence of stem rot disease caused by Sclerotium oryzae in rice. Upon treatment of soil with the consortium of the four native bioagents mentioned above through seed treatment or soil application, variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil were observed, viz., pH (8.08 to 8.28), electrical conductivity (EC) (0.72 to 0.75 d S m−1), organic carbon (OC) (0.57 to 0.68 %), available soil nitrogen (SN) (155 to 315 kg/ha), soil phosphorus (SP) (7.87 to 24.91 kg/ha), soil potassium (SK) (121.29 to 249.42 kg/ha), and soil enzymes (urease (0.73 to 7.33 µg urea hydrolyzed g−1 soil h−1), acid and alkaline phosphatase (0.09 to 1.39 and 0.90 to 1.78 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1), and dehydrogenase (0.14 to 16.44 mg triphenyl formazan (TPF) produced g−1 soil h−1)), compared to untreated soil. Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagents resulted in a significant increase in plant height (39.16%), the number of panicles (30.29%), and average grain yield (41.36%) over control plants. Under controlled conditions, the bioagent-treated plants showed a 69.37% reduction in stem rot disease. The findings of this study indicate a positive correlation between soil properties (pH, EC, OC, SN, SP, SK, and soil enzymes) and plant growth (shoot and root length, fresh and dry weight) as well as a highly negative association of soil properties with stem rot disease severity. The results suggest that using native bioagents as a management strategy can control stem rot disease and enhance crop productivity, while reducing reliance on chemical management. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of sustainable agricultural practices that maximize productivity by minimizing negative environmental impacts, which promotes soil health, plant growth, and disease management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil pH from 8.08 to 8.28.

Treatment
consortium of the four native bioagentse0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
8.08 to 8.28e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon treatment of soil with the consortium of the four native bioagents mentioned above through seed treatment or soil application, variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil were observed, viz., pH (8.08 to 8.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil electrical conductivity from 0.72 to 0.75 d S m−1.

Outcome
electrical conductivity (EC)e0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.72 to 0.75 d S m−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electrical conductivity (EC) (0.72 to 0.75 d S m−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil organic carbon from 0.57 to 0.68%.

Outcome
organic carbon (OC)e0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.57 to 0.68 %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon (OC) (0.57 to 0.68 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased available soil nitrogen from 155 to 315 kg/ha.

Outcome
available soil nitrogen (SN)e0
Direction
increasese1
Value
155 to 315 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available soil nitrogen (SN) (155 to 315 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil phosphorus from 7.87 to 24.91 kg/ha.

Outcome
soil phosphorus (SP)e0
Direction
increasese1
Value
7.87 to 24.91 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil phosphorus (SP) (7.87 to 24.91 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil potassium from 121.29 to 249.42 kg/ha.

Outcome
soil potassium (SK)e0
Direction
increasese1
Value
121.29 to 249.42 kg/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil potassium (SK) (121.29 to 249.42 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased soil urease from 0.73 to 7.33 µg urea hydrolyzed g−1 soil h−1.

Outcome
ureasee0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.73 to 7.33 µg urea hydrolyzed g−1 soil h−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urease (0.73 to 7.33 µg urea hydrolyzed g−1 soil h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased acid phosphatase from 0.09 to 1.39 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1.

Outcome
acide0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.09 to 1.39e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid and alkaline phosphatase (0.09 to 1.39 and 0.90 to 1.78 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased alkaline phosphatase from 0.90 to 1.78 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1.

Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.90 to 1.78 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acid and alkaline phosphatase (0.09 to 1.39 and 0.90 to 1.78 µg of p-nitrophenol released g−1 soil h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium treatment increased dehydrogenase from 0.14 to 16.44 mg triphenyl formazan produced g−1 soil h−1.

Outcome
dehydrogenasee0
Direction
increasese1
Value
0.14 to 16.44 mg triphenyl formazan (TPF) produced g−1 soil h−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydrogenase (0.14 to 16.44 mg triphenyl formazan (TPF) produced g−1 soil h−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1452 · show in text ↑
e1

“variations/increases in the chemical properties of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with the consortium increased rice plant height by 39.16% over control.

Treatment
Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagentse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39.16%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagents resulted in a significant increase in plant height (39.16%), the number of panicles (30.29%), and average grain yield (41.36%) over control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with the consortium increased rice panicle number by 30.29% over control.

Treatment
Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagentse0
Outcome
number of paniclese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30.29%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagents resulted in a significant increase in plant height (39.16%), the number of panicles (30.29%), and average grain yield (41.36%) over control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with the consortium increased average rice grain yield by 41.36% over control.

Treatment
Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagentse0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
41.36%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of seeds with the consortium of four native bioagents resulted in a significant increase in plant height (39.16%), the number of panicles (30.29%), and average grain yield (41.36%) over control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagent-treated rice plants showed 69.37% reduction in stem rot disease under controlled conditions.

Treatment
bioagent-treatede0
Interactor
Sclerotium oryzaeNakataea oryzaee1pathogen
Outcome
stem rot diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
69.37%e0
Setting
controlled conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nakataea oryzae
Nakataea oryzae · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under controlled conditions, the bioagent-treated plants showed a 69.37% reduction in stem rot disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1798 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease caused by Sclerotium oryzae in rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties correlated positively with rice shoot and root length.

Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Qualifier
soil propertiese0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive correlation between soil properties (pH, EC, OC, SN, SP, SK, and soil enzymes) and plant growth (shoot and root length, fresh and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties correlated positively with rice fresh and dry weight.

Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive correlation between soil properties (pH, EC, OC, SN, SP, SK, and soil enzymes) and plant growth (shoot and root length, fresh and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties were negatively associated with rice stem rot severity.

Interactor
Sclerotium oryzaeNakataea oryzaee1pathogen
Outcome
stem rot disease severitye0
Direction
negative associatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nakataea oryzae
Nakataea oryzae · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a highly negative association of soil properties with stem rot disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2078 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease caused by Sclerotium oryzae in rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–728 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend native bioagents to control stem rot and enhance crop productivity.

Interactor
Sclerotium oryzaeNakataea oryzaee1pathogen
Outcome
control stem rot disease and enhance crop productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nakataea oryzae
Nakataea oryzae · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using native bioagents as a management strategy can control stem rot disease and enhance crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2105–2211 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease caused by Sclerotium oryzae in rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–728 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.