Paper · 2023 · Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences

The effects of double-stemmed grafted tomato plants on yield and quality of tomato cultivation

Askar KALYKOV; Ersin POLAT

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In this study, the effect of the production of double-stemmed grafted and non-grafted tomato plants on yield and quality was investigated. Android F1 and Torry F1 tomato (S. lycopersicum L.) cultivars were grafted on “Classmate” tomato rootstock, and grafting was doneaccording to one or two stems for treatments. There were 12 plants in each treatment over 4 grafting and 2 varieties and the plants were provided seedling nursery. The number of stems left in tomato seedlings as grafted and non-grafted was taken as the basis. The plants which are consisting of two stems are formed from the cotyledon axillary buds. The grafting in the experiment were created as follows;.1- grafted-double stem: Shoots were formed with the development of cotyledon axillary buds, 2- Non-grafted-double stem: Shoots were formed with the development of cotyledon axillary buds on cultivars, 3- Grafted-single stem and 4- non-grafted-single stem (control) were formed. In the experiment conducted, the highest plant height (167.25 cm) was obtained from the control treatment and the highest stem diameter (16.58 mm) was obtained from the grafted double stem treatment. L and Hue angel values measured in fruit color of treatments were not statistically significant. The highest total soluble solids (4.46%) was obtained from the non-grafted double stem treatment. In terms of total yield, the highest value (12.27 kg m-2) was obtained in the control plants. The effect of double stem in cotyledon axillary buds on grafted tomato cultivation was found statistically significant on yield, and grafting with double stem decreased the yield, as compare to the control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had the highest height, 167.25 cm.

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
167.25 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest plant height (167.25 cm) was obtained from the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted double-stem plants had the highest stem diameter, 16.58 mm.

Treatment
grafted double stem treatmente0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.58 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest stem diameter (16.58 mm) was obtained from the grafted double stem treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit color L values did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Le0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L and Hue angel values measured in fruit color of treatments were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit color Hue angle values did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Hue angel valuese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L and Hue angel values measured in fruit color of treatments were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-grafted double-stem plants had the highest total soluble solids, 4.46%.

Treatment
non-grafted double stem treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total soluble solids (4.46%) was obtained from the non-grafted double stem treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had the highest total yield, 12.27 kg m-2.

Treatment
control plantse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.27 kg m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of total yield, the highest value (12.27 kg m-2) was obtained in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-stem grafting significantly decreased tomato yield compared with controls.

Treatment
grafting with double steme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting with double stem decreased the yield, as compare to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“grafted tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 151 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.